Peter Tyser wrote:
*snip*
>>> Do others view this issue as a problem that should be fixed?
>> Yes.
>>
>>> If others feel that the jt pointer should be moved to the 2nd item in
>>> global_data structure let me know and I can generate a patch.
>> Add a comment and police it is my vote.
>
> That's
> > I've noticed that the jump table pointer (**jt) in the global_data
> > structure is always the last field in the structure. When standalone
> > applications are compiled, they hard code the jump table pointer offset
> > into the global_data structure. When new versions of U-Boot come out
> >
Peter Tyser wrote:
> Hello,
> I've noticed that the jump table pointer (**jt) in the global_data
> structure is always the last field in the structure. When standalone
> applications are compiled, they hard code the jump table pointer offset
> into the global_data structure. When new versions of
3 matches
Mail list logo
