Hi Aneesh,
sorry for answering this late...
On 08/02/2011 02:41 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Monday 01 August 2011 07:43 PM, Simon Schwarz wrote:
>> Hi Aneesh,
>>
>> On 08/01/2011 02:56 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> On Monday 01 August 2011 04:50 PM, Simon Schwarz wrote:
>>>
Dear Aneesh V,
In message <4e37f082.9060...@ti.com> you wrote:
>
> If my suggestion works I would still prefer that. If you want better
> configurability you can always use u-boot! Direct kernel boot from SPL
> is likely to be used in production systems for improved boot-time,
> where it should b
Hello Aneesh,
Aneesh V wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Monday 01 August 2011 07:43 PM, Simon Schwarz wrote:
>> Hi Aneesh,
>>
>> On 08/01/2011 02:56 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> On Monday 01 August 2011 04:50 PM, Simon Schwarz wrote:
Hi Aneesh,
I am working on the OS booting
Hi Simon,
On Monday 01 August 2011 07:43 PM, Simon Schwarz wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
>
> On 08/01/2011 02:56 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On Monday 01 August 2011 04:50 PM, Simon Schwarz wrote:
>>> Hi Aneesh,
>>>
>>> I am working on the OS booting right now and have a bigger change of
>>> your
Hi Aneesh,
On 08/01/2011 02:56 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Monday 01 August 2011 04:50 PM, Simon Schwarz wrote:
>> Hi Aneesh,
>>
>> I am working on the OS booting right now and have a bigger change of
>> your code in spl.c in mind.
>>
>> Hope you can say one or two words what you think
Hi Simon,
On Monday 01 August 2011 04:50 PM, Simon Schwarz wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
>
> I am working on the OS booting right now and have a bigger change of
> your code in spl.c in mind.
>
> Hope you can say one or two words what you think about it.
>
> THE PROBLEM
> For the direct OS boot and in some
6 matches
Mail list logo
