Hi Peng,
On 18/09/2016 08:50, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 04:40:47PM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On 09/06/2016 07:15 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 07:00:56AM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote:
On 09/06/2016 06:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri,
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 04:40:47PM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote:
>Hi Tom,
>
>On 09/06/2016 07:15 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 07:00:56AM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote:
>>> On 09/06/2016 06:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:53:58PM +0200, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
>
>
>
Hi Tom,
On 09/06/2016 07:15 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 07:00:56AM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote:
>> On 09/06/2016 06:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:53:58PM +0200, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to implement having the next stage also be sen
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:12:55PM +0200, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
>
>
> On 06/09/16 16:00, Eric Nelson wrote:
> >Hi Tom,
> >
> >On 09/06/2016 06:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:53:58PM +0200, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
> >>
> >>Another place this doesn't work (which is where it doesn't
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 07:00:56AM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 09/06/2016 06:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:53:58PM +0200, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
> >> Hi Fabio,
> >>
> >> On 02/09/16 22:03, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >>> You don't need u-boot.imx to boot the board wi
On 06/09/16 16:00, Eric Nelson wrote:
Hi Tom,
On 09/06/2016 06:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:53:58PM +0200, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
Another place this doesn't work (which is where it doesn't work for me)
is when the console is already open and I can't easily take it away to
s
Hi Tom,
On 09/06/2016 06:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:53:58PM +0200, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
>> Hi Fabio,
>>
>> On 02/09/16 22:03, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>> You don't need u-boot.imx to boot the board with imx_usb_loader.
>>> Check the README update that Stefano did with this com
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:53:30AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:53:58PM +0200, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
> >> Hi Fabio,
> >>
> >> On 02/09/16 22:03, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >> >You don't need u-boot.imx to boot the board w
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:53:58PM +0200, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
>> Hi Fabio,
>>
>> On 02/09/16 22:03, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> >You don't need u-boot.imx to boot the board with imx_usb_loader.
>> >Check the README update that Stefano did with this co
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:53:58PM +0200, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> On 02/09/16 22:03, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >You don't need u-boot.imx to boot the board with imx_usb_loader.
> >Check the README update that Stefano did with this commit:
> >
> >commit 40f4839ce12adfc0223d6e3035cf9c3a4754
Hi Otavio,
On 03/09/2016 22:27, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> On 03/09/2016 01:15, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
>>> You are saying that in order to cover my use case(s) I need two
>>> defconfigs. Well, ok...
>>> But how do I integrate this into Buildroot?
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 03/09/2016 01:15, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
>> You are saying that in order to cover my use case(s) I need two
>> defconfigs. Well, ok...
>> But how do I integrate this into Buildroot? For the sake of
>> maintainability, simplification, reducing
Hi Petr,
On 03/09/2016 01:15, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> I need to build two set-ups:
> 1) SPL + u-boot.img for normal device run out of flash
> 2) u-boot.imx for initial device load together with fastboot
>
> For (2) SPL + kermit + u-boot.img is not an option for me, simply
> because
Hi Stefano,
I need to build two set-ups:
1) SPL + u-boot.img for normal device run out of flash
2) u-boot.imx for initial device load together with fastboot
For (2) SPL + kermit + u-boot.img is not an option for me, simply
because it is too slow.
I agree that the u-boot images in case (1) and
Hi Petr,
On 02/09/2016 20:57, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you have already brought it to the point - it needs two defconfigs.
> This means double the files in U-boot and second and more important, how
> does it integrate into a tool like Buildroot?
> In other words I'm trying to do it with just
Hi Fabio,
On 02/09/16 22:03, Fabio Estevam wrote:
You don't need u-boot.imx to boot the board with imx_usb_loader.
Check the README update that Stefano did with this commit:
commit 40f4839ce12adfc0223d6e3035cf9c3a4754a0ec
Author: Stefano Babic
Date: Fri Dec 11 17:30:42 2015 +0100
imx_c
Hi Petr,
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> you have already brought it to the point - it needs two defconfigs.
> This means double the files in U-boot and second and more important, how
> does it integrate into a tool like Buildroot?
Buildroot is capable of booting SP
Hi,
you have already brought it to the point - it needs two defconfigs.
This means double the files in U-boot and second and more important, how
does it integrate into a tool like Buildroot?
In other words I'm trying to do it with just one defconfig.
Alltogether I want to build 3 files:
* SPL
Hi,
On 02/09/2016 18:46, Petr Kulhavy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm facing a problem that the iMX Makefile does not allow to build
> u-boot.imx and the SPL binary simultaneously.
...I am missing why you need to build them at the same time. Can you
start with a detailed description of the problem ? Why is
19 matches
Mail list logo
