Re: [U-Boot] Blackfin: cmd_gpio port/pin naming

2011-01-10 Thread Andreas Pretzsch
Am Montag, den 10.01.2011, 11:28 -0500 schrieb Mike Frysinger: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Andreas Pretzsch wrote: > > As your code already uses the Linux GPIO conventions and naming (without > > the gpio_chip stuff, which is not necessary for a bootloader IMHO), it'd > > be a solid base fo

Re: [U-Boot] Blackfin: cmd_gpio port/pin naming

2011-01-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Andreas Pretzsch wrote: > As your code already uses the Linux GPIO conventions and naming (without > the gpio_chip stuff, which is not necessary for a bootloader IMHO), it'd > be a solid base for that. > > Mr. Denk, are there any plans for a generic GPIO layer in U

Re: [U-Boot] Blackfin: cmd_gpio port/pin naming

2011-01-10 Thread Andreas Pretzsch
Am Freitag, den 07.01.2011, 17:38 -0500 schrieb Mike Frysinger: > On Friday, January 07, 2011 15:50:30 Andreas Pretzsch wrote: > > the Blackfin U-Boot GPIO command (see "arch/blackfin/cpu/cmd_gpio.c") > > specifies the port/pin naming in the form "[p][port]<#>", e.g. PF11. > > The pin portion of t

Re: [U-Boot] Blackfin: cmd_gpio port/pin naming

2011-01-07 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday, January 07, 2011 15:50:30 Andreas Pretzsch wrote: > the Blackfin U-Boot GPIO command (see "arch/blackfin/cpu/cmd_gpio.c") > specifies the port/pin naming in the form "[p][port]<#>", e.g. PF11. > The pin portion of the specified GPIO is limited to 0..15. > While this is correct for Blackf