Re: [U-Boot] [V2 patch 4/4] SMDK6400: Fix SMDK6400 SDRAM init

2011-01-13 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 12-01-2011 17:52, seedshope wrote: >>> Since SDRAM init function have already change, So the SDRAM >>> initial function must be change. >>> Signed-off-by: seedshope >>> diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c >>> b/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c >>> index 35aa40b..52b44a8 10

Re: [U-Boot] [V2 patch 4/4] SMDK6400: Fix SMDK6400 SDRAM init

2011-01-12 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear seedshope, In message <4d2dc040.7040...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > ok, But I don't know how number tab indent is appropriate. May be the > effect as following? You should start reading http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/CodingStyle (and follow the links shown there). Best regards, Wolfgang Den

Re: [U-Boot] [V2 patch 4/4] SMDK6400: Fix SMDK6400 SDRAM init

2011-01-12 Thread seedshope
On 01/12/2011 07:08 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 11-01-2011 17:52, seedshope wrote: > >> Since SDRAM init function have already change, So the SDRAM >> initial function must be change. > >> Signed-off-by: seedshope > >> diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c >> b/board/samsun

Re: [U-Boot] [V2 patch 4/4] SMDK6400: Fix SMDK6400 SDRAM init

2011-01-12 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 11-01-2011 17:52, seedshope wrote: > Since SDRAM init function have already change, So the SDRAM > initial function must be change. > Signed-off-by: seedshope > diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c > b/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c > index 35aa40b..52b44a8 100644 > ---