Re: [U-Boot] [U-BOOT] [PATCH V2] bootm: replace blob_start with image_start

2011-04-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Lei Wen, In message <1294654875-6414-1-git-send-email-lei...@marvell.com> you wrote: > For uImage always has a 64 bytes header, we couldn't expect to do > the xip from the header but should xip from the image start. > > The latter logic in that section is also move the image from image_start

Re: [U-Boot] [U-BOOT] [PATCH V2] bootm: replace blob_start with image_start

2011-02-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday, February 05, 2011 02:57:42 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Did you re-test patch V2? i didnt test either ... v2 looks pretty straight forward though Acked-by: Mike Frysinger -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. _

Re: [U-Boot] [U-BOOT] [PATCH V2] bootm: replace blob_start with image_start

2011-02-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 21:32:10 Lei Wen wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Lei Wen wrote: > > For uImage always has a 64 bytes header, we couldn't expect to do > > the xip from the header but should xip from the image start. > > > > The latter logic in that section is also move the

Re: [U-Boot] [U-BOOT] [PATCH V2] bootm: replace blob_start with image_start

2011-02-04 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 04/02/2011 03:32, Lei Wen a écrit : > Hi Albert, > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Lei Wen wrote: >> For uImage always has a 64 bytes header, we couldn't expect to do >> the xip from the header but should xip from the image start. >> >> The latter logic in that section is also move the image

Re: [U-Boot] [U-BOOT] [PATCH V2] bootm: replace blob_start with image_start

2011-02-03 Thread Lei Wen
Hi Albert, On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Lei Wen wrote: > For uImage always has a 64 bytes header, we couldn't expect to do > the xip from the header but should xip from the image start. > > The latter logic in that section is also move the image from image_start > to the load address, so sync