Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Convert p1_p2_rdb_pc to new spl

2012-09-24 Thread Scott Wood
On 09/24/2012 02:06:55 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 01:50:07PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/21/2012 07:13:24 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:01:10PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > > >> This is based on a merge of top-of-tree plus the 85xx tree and > >the spl > >

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Convert p1_p2_rdb_pc to new spl

2012-09-24 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 01:50:07PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On 09/21/2012 07:13:24 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:01:10PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > > >> This is based on a merge of top-of-tree plus the 85xx tree and > >the spl > >> framework branch (it doesn't use the SPL fr

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Convert p1_p2_rdb_pc to new spl

2012-09-24 Thread Scott Wood
On 09/21/2012 07:13:24 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:01:10PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > This is based on a merge of top-of-tree plus the 85xx tree and the spl > framework branch (it doesn't use the SPL framework code because of size > constraints, but I wanted to make sure t

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Convert p1_p2_rdb_pc to new spl

2012-09-21 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:01:10PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > This is based on a merge of top-of-tree plus the 85xx tree and the spl > framework branch (it doesn't use the SPL framework code because of size > constraints, but I wanted to make sure there were no conflicts with it). > > Tested on P