Hi Wolfgang,
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:30:56 +0100
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Masahiro,
>
> In message <20140324145814.b35f.aa925...@jp.panasonic.com> you wrote:
> >
> > You are suggesting a better idea below.
> > We should not treat SPL as a special case.
> >
> > In my opinion, CONFIG_SPL_* s
Dear Masahiro,
In message <20140324145814.b35f.aa925...@jp.panasonic.com> you wrote:
>
> You are suggesting a better idea below.
> We should not treat SPL as a special case.
>
> In my opinion, CONFIG_SPL_* should be discontinued.
>
> For example, we can merge CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE
> to CONFIG_S
Hi Simon,
> > For example, we can describe a board header file like this:
> >
> > #if defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD)
> > # define CONFIG_FOO 100
> > #elif defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD)
> > # define CONFIG_FOO 50
> > #else
> > # define CONFIG_FOO 10
> > # define CONFIG_BAR
> > #endif
Hi Masahiro,
On 17 March 2014 01:52, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> Several weeks have passed since Kbuild series was merged to the
> code base at 2014.01-rc1.
>
> I think now is a good time to start to discuss the next stage.
> Yes, our promised land, Kconfig.
Great! I have a few general comments b
4 matches
Mail list logo
