On Thursday 17 September 2009 09:13:48 Simon Kagstrom wrote:
> > > Yes, the patch should have contained something like that. Well, we'll
> > > have to cook up a fix for this then. Sorry about that again.
> >
> > Simon, could you do this please?
>
> Yes, absolutely. I'll try to have it done by this
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:56:08 +0200
> > Yes, the patch should have contained something like that. Well, we'll
> > have to cook up a fix for this then. Sorry about that again.
>
> Simon, could you do this please?
Yes, absolutely. I'll try to have it done by this afternoon.
> And btw:
>
> #ifndef
On Thursday 17 September 2009 08:45:21 Simon Kagstrom wrote:
> > One way to solve this would be something like this:
> >
> > include/asm-ppc/bitops.h:
> > @@ -230,6 +231,7 @@ extern __inline__ int ffs(int x)
> > {
> > return __ilog2(x & -x) + 1;
> > }
> > +#define PLATFORM_FFS
> >
> > include
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:19:03 +0200
Stefan Roese wrote:
> include/asm-ppc/bitops.h:
> @@ -230,6 +231,7 @@ extern __inline__ int ffs(int x)
> {
> return __ilog2(x & -x) + 1;
> }
> +#define ffs
>
> So after "ffs()" is define as an inline function, you define it to nothing. I
> understand t
Hi Simon,
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 22:34:43 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Simon Kagstrom,
>
> In message <20090824091012.0df5b...@marrow.netinsight.se> you wrote:
> > Define ffs/fls for all architectures
> >
> > UBIFS requires fls(), which is not defined for arm (and some other
> > architecture
Dear Simon Kagstrom,
In message <20090824091012.0df5b...@marrow.netinsight.se> you wrote:
> Define ffs/fls for all architectures
>
> UBIFS requires fls(), which is not defined for arm (and some other
> architectures) and this patch adds it. The implementation is taken from
> Linux and is generic.
6 matches
Mail list logo