Am Freitag 11 Mai 2012, 18:51:09 schrieb Prafulla Wadaskar:
> I will check on this patch in this week end since I am travelling.
Hi Prafulla,
did you find the time to review the arm/board specific patches in this series
(http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/158627/)?
--
Michael
__
On Friday 11 May 2012 17:22:23 Michael Walle wrote:
> Am Freitag 11 Mai 2012, 23:14:25 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> > Michael Walle wrote:
> > > What about the rand function? I guess that should be two
> > > compile time options
> > >
> > > - CONFIG_RAND
> > > - CONFIG_RANDOM_HWADDR
> > >
> > > Any b
Dear Michael Walle,
In message <201205112342.43133.mich...@walle.cc> you wrote:
> Am Freitag 11 Mai 2012, 23:30:59 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> > Well, you patch did not change this code.
> >
> > And I have to admit that I doubt the increased code size would be
> > worth such a change, at this place.
Am Freitag 11 Mai 2012, 23:30:59 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> Well, you patch did not change this code.
>
> And I have to admit that I doubt the increased code size would be
> worth such a change, at this place.
Ok, can we agree on keeping the rand function in lib/ but using just one macro
CONFIG_RAN
Dear Michael Walle,
In message <201205112322.23891.mich...@walle.cc> you wrote:
>
> > > - CONFIG_RAND
> > > - CONFIG_RANDOM_HWADDR
> > >
> > > Any better names?
> >
> > Please make this a single option, CONFIG_RANDOM_MACADDR. It appears
> > nobody else ever needed a random number before, and we
Am Freitag 11 Mai 2012, 23:14:25 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> Dear Michael Walle,
>
> In message <201205112254.13896.mich...@walle.cc> you wrote:
> > What about the rand function? I guess that should be two
> > compile time options
> >
> > - CONFIG_RAND
> > - CONFIG_RANDOM_HWADDR
> >
> > Any better
Dear Michael Walle,
In message <201205112254.13896.mich...@walle.cc> you wrote:
>
> What about the rand function? I guess that should be two
> compile time options
>
> - CONFIG_RAND
> - CONFIG_RANDOM_HWADDR
>
> Any better names?
Please make this a single option, CONFIG_RANDOM_MACADDR. It appe
Am Freitag 11 Mai 2012, 22:43:16 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> Keep these patches together, please. The responsible
custodians can
> still ACK individual patches of the series.
>
> The fact that only a single board ever needed these
functions makes me
> wonder if these are really of any general use.
Dear Michael Walle,
In message <201205112229.44084.mich...@walle.cc> you wrote:
>
> > Please submit with the patches that actually use this code.
>
> Please have a look at
> "[PATCH v4] Kirkwood: add lschlv2 and lsxhl board support"
>
> All introduced functions are used by this bsp. The origin
Am Freitag 11 Mai 2012, 21:18:50 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
> Dear Michael Walle,
>
> In message <1336671134-16342-1-git-send-email-mich...@walle.cc> you wrote:
> > This patchset is a split-off from my patch series "Kirkwood: add lschlv2
> > and lsxhl board support".
> >
> > Changes:
> >
> > v4:
> >
Dear Michael Walle,
In message <1336671134-16342-1-git-send-email-mich...@walle.cc> you wrote:
> This patchset is a split-off from my patch series "Kirkwood: add lschlv2
> and lsxhl board support".
>
> Changes:
> v4:
> - typo fixes (thanks Mike)
> - seed all 46bits of the generated ethernet add
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Hershberger [mailto:joe.hershber...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 11 May 2012 09:47
> To: Michael Walle
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] net: helper functions
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Michael W
Hi Michael,
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 10 Mai 2012, 19:32:11 schrieb Michael Walle:
>> This patchset is a split-off from my patch series "Kirkwood: add lschlv2
>> and lsxhl board support".
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> will you ack/nak these patch series and in case
Am Donnerstag 10 Mai 2012, 19:32:11 schrieb Michael Walle:
> This patchset is a split-off from my patch series "Kirkwood: add lschlv2
> and lsxhl board support".
Hi Joe,
will you ack/nak these patch series and in case of an ack, Prafulla will fetch
these into his tree? Or how is it supposed to w
14 matches
Mail list logo
