Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/3] mpc5121: add support for PDM360NG board

2010-04-15 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Anatolij Gustschin, In message <20100415143214.3e108...@wker> you wrote: > > > With this change, can we then not also get rid of manually defining > > CONFIG_PDM360NG_BIG ? We should be able to auto-detect the > > configuration from the actual RAM size now, right? > > But another configura

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/3] mpc5121: add support for PDM360NG board

2010-04-15 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Anatolij, On Thursday 15 April 2010 14:32:14 Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > > With this change, can we then not also get rid of manually defining > > CONFIG_PDM360NG_BIG ? We should be able to auto-detect the > > configuration from the actual RAM size now, right? > > But another configuration fo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/3] mpc5121: add support for PDM360NG board

2010-04-15 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Hello Wolfgang, On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:48:40 +0200 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <1271254909-20398-3-git-send-email-ag...@denx.de> you wrote: > > PDM360NG is a MPC5121E based board by ifm ecomatic gmbh. > ... > > - don't use DDR RAM size config macro, get_ram_size() is > >used now in fi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/3] mpc5121: add support for PDM360NG board

2010-04-14 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Anatolij Gustschin, In message <1271254909-20398-3-git-send-email-ag...@denx.de> you wrote: > PDM360NG is a MPC5121E based board by ifm ecomatic gmbh. ... > - don't use DDR RAM size config macro, get_ram_size() is >used now in fixed_sdram() to determine RAM size (see >previous patch