Hello Alexander,
Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 22.01.2011 08:46, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
>> Le 22/01/2011 06:39, Alexander Holler a écrit :
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Am 21.01.2011 09:56, schrieb Heiko Schocher:
>>>
-static ulong timestamp;
-static ulong lastdec;
+DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>>
Am 22.01.2011 08:46, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> Le 22/01/2011 06:39, Alexander Holler a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> Am 21.01.2011 09:56, schrieb Heiko Schocher:
>>
>>> -static ulong timestamp;
>>> -static ulong lastdec;
>>> +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>>> +
>>> +#define timestamp gd->tbl
>>> +#define last
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
> However a general rework of ARM timer code is in order so that all SoCs
> and CPUs share the same set of gd variables with the same names and the
> same logic; and when we get that, this code shall move along.
>
> About this rework, as the saying goes... "Patches Welcome ©".
Le 22/01/2011 06:39, Alexander Holler a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Am 21.01.2011 09:56, schrieb Heiko Schocher:
>
>> -static ulong timestamp;
>> -static ulong lastdec;
>> +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>> +
>> +#define timestamp gd->tbl
>> +#define lastdec gd->lastinc
>
> I'm the only one who doesn't like suc
Hello,
Am 21.01.2011 09:56, schrieb Heiko Schocher:
> -static ulong timestamp;
> -static ulong lastdec;
> +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
> +
> +#define timestamp gd->tbl
> +#define lastdec gd->lastinc
I'm the only one who doesn't like such defines? They might be handy for
quick fixes, but in regard
Hi Heiko,
Le 21/01/2011 09:56, Heiko Schocher a écrit :
> Reuse the gd->tbl value for timestamp and add gd->lastinc for lastinc bss
> values in the arm926ejs timers implementation.
>
> The usage of bss values in drivers before initialisation of bss is forbidden.
> In that special case some data in
6 matches
Mail list logo
