Dear Aneesh V,
In message <4dde54e5.7080...@ti.com> you wrote:
>
> >> And how do you distinguish between the two cases at the top level
> >> Makefile? Using a CONFIG flag or on a per platform basis?
> >
> > The decision should not be make in the top level makefile, but in
> > spl/Makefile. And th
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thursday 26 May 2011 06:55 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> On Tuesday 17 May 2011 06:23 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Aneesh V,
>>
>> In message<4dd26b36.4050...@ti.com> you wrote:
>>>
>>> And how do you distinguish between the two cases at the top level
>>> Makefile? Usi
Hi Wolfgang,
What's your final view on the Makefile structure of SPL.
best regards,
Aneesh
On Thursday 26 May 2011 06:55 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> On Tuesday 17 May 2011 06:23 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Aneesh V,
>>
>> In message<4dd26b36.4050...@ti.com> you wrote:
>>>
>>> And
Hi Wolfgang,
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 06:23 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Aneesh V,
>
> In message<4dd26b36.4050...@ti.com> you wrote:
>>
>> And how do you distinguish between the two cases at the top level
>> Makefile? Using a CONFIG flag or on a per platform basis?
>
> The decision should not b
Dear Aneesh V,
In message <4dd26b36.4050...@ti.com> you wrote:
>
> And how do you distinguish between the two cases at the top level
> Makefile? Using a CONFIG flag or on a per platform basis?
The decision should not be make in the top level makefile, but in
spl/Makefile. And this can simply ch
Hi Wolfgang,
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 01:49 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Aneesh V,
>
> In message<4dd21fb9.6070...@ti.com> you wrote:
>>
>> The top-level make rule being the following, we will need a Makefile in
>> the board directory, right?
>>
>> +SPL:$(TIMESTAMP_FILE) $(VERSION_FILE) depe
Dear Aneesh V,
In message <4dd21fb9.6070...@ti.com> you wrote:
>
> The top-level make rule being the following, we will need a Makefile in
> the board directory, right?
>
> +SPL:$(TIMESTAMP_FILE) $(VERSION_FILE) depend tools
> +$(MAKE) -C spl/board/$(BOARDDIR) all
Maybe this needs to be
Hi Wolfgang,
On Monday 16 May 2011 09:18 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Aneesh V,
>
> In message<4dd134dd.6040...@ti.com> you wrote:
>>
create mode 100644 spl/board/ti/omap4.mk
create mode 100644 spl/board/ti/rules-omap.mk
>>>
>>> We do you introduce these files? Please omit the
Dear Aneesh V,
In message <4dd134dd.6040...@ti.com> you wrote:
>
> >> create mode 100644 spl/board/ti/omap4.mk
> >> create mode 100644 spl/board/ti/rules-omap.mk
> >
> > We do you introduce these files? Please omit them, and use a plain
> > Makefile instead.
>
> I introduced them because 's
Hi wolfgang,
On Monday 16 May 2011 12:03 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Aneesh V,
>
> In message<1305472900-4004-10-git-send-email-ane...@ti.com> you wrote:
>> Adapted from: nand_spl/board/samsung/smdk6400/Makefile
>>
>> - Add the SPL makefile for OMAP4430 SDP
>> - Add the necessary CONFIG flags
Dear Aneesh V,
In message <1305472900-4004-10-git-send-email-ane...@ti.com> you wrote:
> Adapted from: nand_spl/board/samsung/smdk6400/Makefile
>
> - Add the SPL makefile for OMAP4430 SDP
> - Add the necessary CONFIG flags in the board config file
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
> ---
> V2:
> * Ch
Dear Aneesh V,
In message <1305472900-4004-10-git-send-email-ane...@ti.com> you wrote:
> Adapted from: nand_spl/board/samsung/smdk6400/Makefile
>
> - Add the SPL makefile for OMAP4430 SDP
> - Add the necessary CONFIG flags in the board config file
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh V
> ---
> V2:
> * Ch
12 matches
Mail list logo
