Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/45] Verified boot implementation based on FIT

2013-04-30 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 06:44:53PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: >>> On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 16:03:20 -0700 >>> Simon Glass wrote: >>> >>> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Ki

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/45] Verified boot implementation based on FIT

2013-04-25 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 06:44:53PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: >> On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 16:03:20 -0700 >> Simon Glass wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Kim Phillips >> > wrote: >> > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:51:20 -0700 >> > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/45] Verified boot implementation based on FIT

2013-04-23 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 06:44:53PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: > On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 16:03:20 -0700 > Simon Glass wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Kim Phillips > > wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:51:20 -0700 > > > Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > >> I have received a number of off-l

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/45] Verified boot implementation based on FIT

2013-04-22 Thread Kim Phillips
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 16:03:20 -0700 Simon Glass wrote: > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Kim Phillips > wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:51:20 -0700 > > Simon Glass wrote: > > > >> I have received a number of off-list comments - please do copy the list > >> when > >> replying so that everyone

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/45] Verified boot implementation based on FIT

2013-04-20 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Kim, On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Kim Phillips wrote: > On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:51:20 -0700 > Simon Glass wrote: > >> I have received a number of off-list comments - please do copy the list when >> replying so that everyone can see your comments. > > I don't have time to fully review 45 pat

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/45] Verified boot implementation based on FIT

2013-04-17 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Jagan, On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: >>> Hi Simon, >>> >>> I am new to this verification boot concept, could you please clarify >>> my que

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/45] Verified boot implementation based on FIT

2013-04-17 Thread Jagan Teki
Hi Simon, On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >> I am new to this verification boot concept, could you please clarify >> my questions. >> >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >>> This

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/45] Verified boot implementation based on FIT

2013-04-17 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: > Hi Simon, > > I am new to this verification boot concept, could you please clarify > my questions. > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> This series implemented a verified boot system based around FIT images >> as disc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/45] Verified boot implementation based on FIT

2013-04-15 Thread Jagan Teki
Hi Simon, I am new to this verification boot concept, could you please clarify my questions. On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > This series implemented a verified boot system based around FIT images > as discussed on the U-Boot mailing list, including on this thread: > > http:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/45] Verified boot implementation based on FIT

2013-04-01 Thread Kim Phillips
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:51:20 -0700 Simon Glass wrote: > I have received a number of off-list comments - please do copy the list when > replying so that everyone can see your comments. I don't have time to fully review 45 patches, let alone the subject matter (e.g., no support for RSA in h/w, eh?