On Wednesday 11 January 2012 13:19:52 Doug Anderson wrote:
> + if (cmdline && (cmdline[0] != '\0')) {
> + char *start = strstr(cmdline, CONSOLE_ARG);
> +
> if (start) {
> - end = strchr(start, ' ');
> - strncpy(buf, cmdline, (sta
On Tuesday 10 January 2012 17:51:15 Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > I think your patch is likely to break all these architectures?
>
> I'm not sure how my patch would break these architectures.
if the kernel doesn't do len checking on the input str
On Tuesday 10 January 2012 17:28:05 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Doug Anderson wrote:
> > This makes fixup_silent_linux() use malloc() to allocate its
> > working space, meaning that our maximum kernel command line
> > should only be limited by malloc(). Previously it was silently
> > overflowing the st
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> This makes fixup_silent_linux() use malloc() to allocate its
>> working space, meaning that our maximum kernel command line
>> should only be limited by malloc(). Previously it was silently
>> overflowing the stack.
> .
Dear Doug Anderson,
In message <1319133298-30249-1-git-send-email-diand...@chromium.org> you wrote:
> This makes fixup_silent_linux() use malloc() to allocate its
> working space, meaning that our maximum kernel command line
> should only be limited by malloc(). Previously it was silently
> overf
5 matches
Mail list logo
