Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Change kernel address in dataflash to match u-boot's size

2012-02-20 Thread Alexandre Belloni
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:46:58AM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote : > Hmm... With 8MByte FLASH the proposed mapping leaves 7+ MB for the > flashed kernel, which should be enough :) so that's ok. > Ok then, I just prefixed the patch title with AT91SAM9*: Regards, -- Alexandre Belloni _

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Change kernel address in dataflash to match u-boot's size

2012-02-20 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Alexandre, Le 20/02/2012 11:40, Alexandre Belloni a écrit : Hi, On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 05:21:46PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote : Also, doesn't this overallocate for U-Boot and seriously reduce the space available for Linux in Flash? I did so on Marek's recommendation. Right now, u-boot's

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Change kernel address in dataflash to match u-boot's size

2012-02-20 Thread Alexandre Belloni
Hi, On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 05:21:46PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote : > Also, doesn't this overallocate for U-Boot and seriously reduce the > space available for Linux in Flash? > I did so on Marek's recommendation. Right now, u-boot's size for AT91SAM9261EK is 235kB. I guess we can allocate a bi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Change kernel address in dataflash to match u-boot's size

2012-02-18 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi again Alexandre, Le 18/02/2012 16:13, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit : Le 29/01/2012 22:37, Alexandre Belloni a écrit : On at91sam platforms, u-boot grew larger than the allocated size in dataflash, the layout was: bootstrap 0x ubootenv 0x4200 uboot 0x8400 kernel 0x00042000 u-boot w

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Change kernel address in dataflash to match u-boot's size

2012-02-18 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 29/01/2012 22:37, Alexandre Belloni a écrit : On at91sam platforms, u-boot grew larger than the allocated size in dataflash, the layout was: bootstrap 0x ubootenv 0x4200 uboot 0x8400 kernel 0x00042000 u-boot with the defconfig doesn't seem to fit in 0x42000 - 0x840