On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:46:58AM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote :
> Hmm... With 8MByte FLASH the proposed mapping leaves 7+ MB for the
> flashed kernel, which should be enough :) so that's ok.
>
Ok then, I just prefixed the patch title with AT91SAM9*:
Regards,
--
Alexandre Belloni
_
Hi Alexandre,
Le 20/02/2012 11:40, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 05:21:46PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote :
Also, doesn't this overallocate for U-Boot and seriously reduce the
space available for Linux in Flash?
I did so on Marek's recommendation. Right now, u-boot's
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 05:21:46PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote :
> Also, doesn't this overallocate for U-Boot and seriously reduce the
> space available for Linux in Flash?
>
I did so on Marek's recommendation. Right now, u-boot's size for
AT91SAM9261EK is 235kB. I guess we can allocate a bi
Hi again Alexandre,
Le 18/02/2012 16:13, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
Le 29/01/2012 22:37, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
On at91sam platforms, u-boot grew larger than the allocated size in
dataflash, the layout was:
bootstrap 0x
ubootenv 0x4200
uboot 0x8400
kernel 0x00042000
u-boot w
Le 29/01/2012 22:37, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
On at91sam platforms, u-boot grew larger than the allocated size in
dataflash, the layout was:
bootstrap 0x
ubootenv 0x4200
uboot 0x8400
kernel 0x00042000
u-boot with the defconfig doesn't seem to fit in 0x42000 - 0x840
5 matches
Mail list logo