Hi Simon,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Looks good - yes I will prepare a new series to send likely on Thursday.
>
> Not that it matters for now, but who will define INCLUDE_X86_RESET_VECTOR?
It's calculated in the Makefile as an inversion of CONFIG_X86_NO_RESET_VECT
Hi Graeme,
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>
diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/resetvec.S b/arch/x86/cpu/resetvec.S
index 44aee5f..5b359ff 100644
--- a/arch/x86/cpu/resetvec.S
+++ b/arch/x86/cpu/re
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/resetvec.S b/arch/x86/cpu/resetvec.S
>>> index 44aee5f..5b359ff 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/cpu/resetvec.S
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/resetvec.S
>>> @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@
>>>
>>> /* Reset vector, jumps to start16
Hi Graeme,
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> At first I thought this patch dealt with the 'board reset' code but
> then realised it deals with the 'reset vector' - Can you fix the patch
> subject please
Will do.
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Simon Glass
Hi Simon,
At first I thought this patch dealt with the 'board reset' code but
then realised it deals with the 'reset vector' - Can you fix the patch
subject please
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> From: Gabe Black
>
> When running from coreboot we don't want this code.
>
>
5 matches
Mail list logo