Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] mpc83xx: Make start.S true PIC

2011-01-09 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2011/01/10 00:25:59: > > Dear Joakim Tjernlund, > > In message > you > wrote: > > > > > But your new code does not reference CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE at all, > > > but uses CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_BASE instead. > > > > You can't assume a fixed address when doing PIC therefore the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] mpc83xx: Make start.S true PIC

2011-01-09 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Joakim Tjernlund, In message you wrote: > > > But your new code does not reference CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE at all, > > but uses CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_BASE instead. > > You can't assume a fixed address when doing PIC therefore the change. I understand this change is intentionally, then? > > O

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] mpc83xx: Make start.S true PIC

2011-01-09 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2011/01/09 21:44:08: > > Dear Joakim Tjernlund, > > In message <1292838435-14958-1-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se> > you wrote: > > Remove dependencies on link address. Use GOT and > > add an new function to calculate the actual address. > > > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] mpc83xx: Make start.S true PIC

2011-01-09 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Joakim Tjernlund, In message <1292838435-14958-1-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se> you wrote: > Remove dependencies on link address. Use GOT and > add an new function to calculate the actual address. > > Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund > --- > arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S