Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] RFC: create u-boot-common.lds

2012-02-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 05 February 2012 23:34:27 Graeme Russ wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Sunday 05 February 2012 22:43:33 Graeme Russ wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> > it isn't just that. i don't think a single u-boot.lds for ever

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] RFC: create u-boot-common.lds

2012-02-05 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Mike, On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 05 February 2012 22:43:33 Graeme Russ wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > it isn't just that.  i don't think a single u-boot.lds for every arch is >> > feasible.  the kernel method allows a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] RFC: create u-boot-common.lds

2012-02-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 05 February 2012 22:43:33 Graeme Russ wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > it isn't just that. i don't think a single u-boot.lds for every arch is > > feasible. the kernel method allows all the common pieces to be in a > > common header, and then the arches

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] RFC: create u-boot-common.lds

2012-02-05 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Mike, On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 05 February 2012 17:07:41 Graeme Russ wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > On Saturday 04 February 2012 22:02:45 Troy Kisky wrote: >> >> --- /dev/null >> >> +++ b/u-boot-common.lds >> >> >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] RFC: create u-boot-common.lds

2012-02-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 05 February 2012 17:07:41 Graeme Russ wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday 04 February 2012 22:02:45 Troy Kisky wrote: > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/u-boot-common.lds > >> > >> + . = ALIGN(4); > >> + __u_boot_cmd_start = .; > >> + .u_

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] RFC: create u-boot-common.lds

2012-02-05 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Mike, On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 04 February 2012 22:02:45 Troy Kisky wrote: > > since we preprocess our linker scripts now, i'd suggest using #include rather > than INCLUDE +1 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/u-boot-common.lds >> >> +     . = ALIGN(4); >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] RFC: create u-boot-common.lds

2012-02-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 04 February 2012 22:02:45 Troy Kisky wrote: > arch/blackfin/cpu/u-boot.lds > is warranted. yes, this change will break Blackfin boards for sure > --- a/arch/blackfin/cpu/u-boot.lds > +++ b/arch/blackfin/cpu/u-boot.lds > > MEMORY > { > #if CONFIG_MEM_SIZE > - ram : ORIGIN =