Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/11] fw_env.c: Increase max dev path to 32

2013-10-07 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 07:47:13AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom, > > In message <20131006205527.GP15917@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > > > > Do we really need a static size here? Can we not auto-adjust to the > > > needed size, say by dynamically allocating the buffer? > > > > Doesn't l

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/11] fw_env.c: Increase max dev path to 32

2013-10-06 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom, In message <20131006205527.GP15917@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > > Do we really need a static size here? Can we not auto-adjust to the > > needed size, say by dynamically allocating the buffer? > > Doesn't look like it, without a big change to the parsing code. I don't think this requ

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/11] fw_env.c: Increase max dev path to 32

2013-10-06 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 10:02:12PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > In message <1380227287-26057-2-git-send-email-tr...@ti.com> you wrote: > > Currently our limit is too small to allow for /dev/mmcblk0boot0 to work, > > for example. Expand to 32 for future needs. > > > > Signed-o

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/11] fw_env.c: Increase max dev path to 32

2013-10-05 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom Rini, In message <1380227287-26057-2-git-send-email-tr...@ti.com> you wrote: > Currently our limit is too small to allow for /dev/mmcblk0boot0 to work, > for example. Expand to 32 for future needs. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini > --- > tools/env/fw_env.c |2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 i