Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/25] dm: Convert TPM drivers to driver model

Hi Christophe, On 13 August 2015 at 16:52, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Christophe, > > On 13 August 2015 at 14:22, Christophe Ricard > wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >> Thanks for the review and your comments. >> Please see mine below: >> >> >> On 13/08/2015 03:30, Simon Glass wrote: >>> >>> Hi Christophe,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/25] dm: Convert TPM drivers to driver model

Hi Christophe, On 13 August 2015 at 14:22, Christophe Ricard wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Thanks for the review and your comments. > Please see mine below: > > > On 13/08/2015 03:30, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi Christophe, >> >> On 11 August 2015 at 15:50, christophe.ricard >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Simon,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/25] dm: Convert TPM drivers to driver model

Hi Simon, Thanks for the review and your comments. Please see mine below: On 13/08/2015 03:30, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Christophe, On 11 August 2015 at 15:50, christophe.ricard wrote: Hi Simon, I pretty much like the move to driver model for TPM. However, i have some few remarks: The current

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/25] dm: Convert TPM drivers to driver model

Hi Christophe, On 11 August 2015 at 15:50, christophe.ricard wrote: > Hi Simon, > > I pretty much like the move to driver model for TPM. > However, i have some few remarks: > > The current i2c driver stick to Infineon TPMs and will not support any other > vendors like ST(in my case). > The main r

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/25] dm: Convert TPM drivers to driver model

Hi Simon, I pretty much like the move to driver model for TPM. However, i have some few remarks: The current i2c driver stick to Infineon TPMs and will not support any other vendors like ST(in my case). The main reason for this is that there is no transport protocol over I2C specification defi