Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] NetStar updates

2010-02-08 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 01:21:42PM -0600, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: > > I fixed all the checkpatch errors myself and pushed the entire series. > > Thank you for your effort, I really appreciate it. However, the dark side > is that now it is pretty unobvious, what actually changed and that's > why

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] NetStar updates

2010-02-08 Thread Ladislav Michl
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 01:21:42PM -0600, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: > I fixed all the checkpatch errors myself and pushed the entire series. Thank you for your effort, I really appreciate it. However, the dark side is that now it is pretty unobvious, what actually changed and that's why incremental

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] NetStar updates

2010-02-08 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
> > I used scripts/checkpatch.pl from linux-2.6.33-rc5 and for patch 5 it > reports > patch "has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission". For > others > two it reports lines over 80 characters. > > > Please fix them and resend the entire series to the list again. > > Sorry, I'm

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] NetStar updates

2010-02-08 Thread Ladislav Michl
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:55:04AM -0600, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: > Patches 1, 4 and 5 returned checkpatch errors. I used scripts/checkpatch.pl from linux-2.6.33-rc5 and for patch 5 it reports patch "has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission". For others two it reports lines over 8

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] NetStar updates

2010-02-08 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
> > Dear Sandeep, > > following patches are intended to bring NetStar board to useable state. > Similar fixes for linker errors will be needed for VoiceBlue board - I'll > send them later, of course if you do not have any objections against this > solution. > > Best regards, > ladis Pat