Valentin,
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Valentin Yakovenkov
wrote:
> 22.04.2010 23:43, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> i would send the patch again with this info in the changelog. however, at
>> least on my board, i see no speed difference with this patch. i get about
>> 2.8MiB/s on my bf548-ez
22.04.2010 23:43, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i would send the patch again with this info in the changelog. however, at
least on my board, i see no speed difference with this patch. i get about
2.8MiB/s on my bf548-ezkit with and without your change. so, it doesnt break
anything that i can see, nor
On Thursday 22 April 2010 15:12:19 Valentin Yakovenkov wrote:
> 21.04.2010 23:52, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> Wrong alignment in smc911x driver when reading a frame from fifo.
> >>> Neither smc911x chip nor U-Boot doesn't use IP-alignment, so we don't
> >>> need to add anything here.
> >>
> >> I k
21.04.2010 23:52, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Wrong alignment in smc911x driver when reading a frame from fifo.
Neither smc911x chip nor U-Boot doesn't use IP-alignment, so we don't
need to add anything here.
I know you use this driver a lot. Please comment on this patch.
i really havent a clue wh
On Wednesday 21 April 2010 13:52:27 Ben Warren wrote:
> On 4/21/2010 12:56 AM, Valentin Yakovenkov wrote:
> > Wrong alignment in smc911x driver when reading a frame from fifo.
> > Neither smc911x chip nor U-Boot doesn't use IP-alignment, so we don't
> > need to add anything here.
>
> I know you use
Mike,
I know you use this driver a lot. Please comment on this patch.
On 4/21/2010 12:56 AM, Valentin Yakovenkov wrote:
> Wrong alignment in smc911x driver when reading a frame from fifo.
> Neither smc911x chip nor U-Boot doesn't use IP-alignment, so we don't
> need to add anything here.
>
> Sig
6 matches
Mail list logo
