Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc/dwmmc: remove recursive FIFO threshold setup

Hi Pantelis, Indeed this is bogus. What is the reset value of the fifoth register? > Below is a description for the register in question with default values specified. -- FIFO Threshold Watermark Register -- x

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc/dwmmc: remove recursive FIFO threshold setup

Hi, Alexey. On 11/27/2013 04:45 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Hi Pantelis, > > On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 09:21 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >> Hi Alexey, >> >> On Nov 27, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: >> > >> ATM if no host->fifoth_val value is provided the code will calculate one and >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc/dwmmc: remove recursive FIFO threshold setup

Hi Alexey, On Nov 27, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Hi Pantelis, > > On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 09:21 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >> Hi Alexey, >> >> On Nov 27, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: >> > >> ATM if no host->fifoth_val value is provided the code will calculate one

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc/dwmmc: remove recursive FIFO threshold setup

Hi Alexey, On Nov 27, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Hi Jaehoon, > > On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 14:33 +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: >> Hi, Alexey, >> >> I think good that use the initial fifoth value at register. >> Then we need not to change the value. >> But according to my experiment, so

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc/dwmmc: remove recursive FIFO threshold setup

Hi, Alexey, I think good that use the initial fifoth value at register. Then we need not to change the value. But according to my experiment, some SoC needs to change the fifoth value. On 11/27/2013 12:08 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Removed code works properly only once after power-up because on