Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fm-eth: Add ability for board code to disable a port

2011-10-03 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 14, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > The SoC configuration may have more ports enabled than a given board > actually can utilize. Add a routinue that allows the board code to > disable a port that it knows isn't being used. > > fm_disable_port() needs to be called before cpu_eth_in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fm-eth: Add ability for board code to disable a port

2011-09-14 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 15, 2011, at 12:11 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kumar Gala, > > In message you > wrote: >> >> Now you could say that we should deal with this via #defines. Which is >> true, however our reference boards allow for running in hundreds if not >> thousands of various possible HW config

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fm-eth: Add ability for board code to disable a port

2011-09-14 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kumar Gala, In message you wrote: > > Now you could say that we should deal with this via #defines. Which is > true, however our reference boards allow for running in hundreds if not > thousands of various possible HW configurations and we've tried to avoid > having different builds for su

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fm-eth: Add ability for board code to disable a port

2011-09-14 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 14, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kumar Gala, > > In message <1316020387-6252-1-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org> you > wrote: >> The SoC configuration may have more ports enabled than a given board >> actually can utilize. Add a routinue that allows the board co

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fm-eth: Add ability for board code to disable a port

2011-09-14 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kumar Gala, In message <1316020387-6252-1-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote: > The SoC configuration may have more ports enabled than a given board > actually can utilize. Add a routinue that allows the board code to > disable a port that it knows isn't being used. I don'