On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> This is basically the same code (with only irrelevant differences) as
> used by do_bootm_netbsd(). Can you please
>
> 1) factor out this common code, and
> 2) documnt the behaviour
> ?
Will do.
> By the way: this patch still triggers two
Dear Steven Stallion,
In message <1370562103-92148-1-git-send-email-sstall...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> This patch introduces support for command line arguments to Plan 9.
> Plan 9 generally dedicates a small region of kernel memory (known
> as CONFADDR) for runtime configuration. A new environment
Dear Steven Stallion,
In message
you wrote:
>
> > "bootm" has a well-known an documented API: it takes up to three
> > arguments: kernel address, ramdisk address, and device tree address.
> > Nothing else.
>
> Is there a reason that this should only be used by Linux? The changes
> I have submit
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Steven Stallion wrote:
> This patch introduces support for command line arguments to Plan 9.
> Plan 9 generally dedicates a small region of kernel memory (known
> as CONFADDR) for runtime configuration. A new environment variable
> named confaddr was introduced to
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Steven,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>>
>> Hmm. Are you arguing against supporting command line arguments to bootm, or
>> that bootm should copy these arguments to bootargs prior to boot? This has
>> actually been very useful to test
Dear Steven,
In message
you wrote:
>
> Hmm. Are you arguing against supporting command line arguments to bootm, or
> that bootm should copy these arguments to bootargs prior to boot? This has
> actually been very useful to test changes without having to update my
> bootargs environment variable.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message ceumhu8u4enqyj3wt3rqyvdzatw...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
> >
> > > Please make this code configurable, so that people who never intend to
> > > use Plan 9 do not suffer from the increased code size.
> >
> > This is already done,
Dear Steven,
please always keep the mailing list on Cc: - this is especially
important for patch reviews, where such messages need to be picked up
for patchwork, too.
In message
you wrote:
>
> > Please make this code configurable, so that people who never intend to
> > use Plan 9 do not suffer
Dear Steven Stallion,
In message <1370563140-31368-1-git-send-email-sstall...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> This patch introduces support for command line arguments to Plan 9.
> Plan 9 generally dedicates a small region of kernel memory (known
> as CONFADDR) for runtime configuration. A new environment
9 matches
Mail list logo
