Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Don't use printf() in SPL builds

2012-05-07 Thread Tom Rini
On 05/07/2012 05:28 AM, Stefan Roese wrote: On Saturday 03 March 2012 21:33:15 Simon Glass wrote: raise() likes to call printf() if it is available, but in SPL builds it either is not available, or adds a large chunk to the resulting image size. So don't call it even if it is available. This c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Don't use printf() in SPL builds

2012-05-07 Thread Stefan Roese
On Saturday 03 March 2012 21:33:15 Simon Glass wrote: > raise() likes to call printf() if it is available, but in SPL builds it > either is not available, or adds a large chunk to the resulting image > size. > > So don't call it even if it is available. > > This change reduces SPL size from 10KB

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Don't use printf() in SPL builds

2012-03-16 Thread Sughosh Ganu
hi Simon, On Wed Mar 14, 2012 at 08:47:43PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > >   Can you please check if libcommon support is needed for the > >   cam_enc_4xx board -- your relocation patch series did not add > >   CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT to this board. This will affect my > >   patch to in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Don't use printf() in SPL builds

2012-03-15 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Christian, On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Christian Riesch wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Yes I am talking about building with the generic relocation series >> included, so a slightly different point. With that I get: >> >> $ make -j8 -s >> Ge

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Don't use printf() in SPL builds

2012-03-15 Thread Christian Riesch
Hi Simon, On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Yes I am talking about building with the generic relocation series > included, so a slightly different point. With that I get: > > $ make -j8 -s > Generating include/generated/asm-offsets.h > arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/libdavinci

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Don't use printf() in SPL builds

2012-03-14 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Simon, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Heiko, > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote: >> Hello Simon, >> >> Simon Glass wrote: >>> Hi Sughosh, >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Sughosh Ganu >>> wrote: hi Simon, On Sat Mar 03, 2012 at 12:33:15PM -0800, S

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Don't use printf() in SPL builds

2012-03-14 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Heiko, On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Simon, > > Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Sughosh, >> >> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Sughosh Ganu >> wrote: >>> hi Simon, >>> >>> On Sat Mar 03, 2012 at 12:33:15PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote: raise() likes to call prin

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Don't use printf() in SPL builds

2012-03-14 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Simon, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Sughosh, > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Sughosh Ganu > wrote: >> hi Simon, >> >> On Sat Mar 03, 2012 at 12:33:15PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote: >>> raise() likes to call printf() if it is available, but in SPL builds it >>> either is not available, or ad

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Don't use printf() in SPL builds

2012-03-14 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Sughosh, On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Sughosh Ganu wrote: > hi Simon, > > On Sat Mar 03, 2012 at 12:33:15PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote: >> raise() likes to call printf() if it is available, but in SPL builds it >> either is not available, or adds a large chunk to the resulting image >> size

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Don't use printf() in SPL builds

2012-03-10 Thread Sughosh Ganu
hi Simon, On Sat Mar 03, 2012 at 12:33:15PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote: > raise() likes to call printf() if it is available, but in SPL builds it > either is not available, or adds a large chunk to the resulting image > size. > > So don't call it even if it is available. > > This change reduces SP

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Don't use printf() in SPL builds

2012-03-05 Thread Stefan Roese
On Saturday 03 March 2012 21:33:15 Simon Glass wrote: > raise() likes to call printf() if it is available, but in SPL builds it > either is not available, or adds a large chunk to the resulting image > size. > > So don't call it even if it is available. > > This change reduces SPL size from 10KB