Paladugu
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arch: armv8: Remove the error when dcache is
off
On 27.06.17 13:52, Michal Simek wrote:
On 27.6.2017 13:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.06.17 13:20, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
On 27.6.2017 13:01, Alexander Graf wrote:
I don't think that's going to
e: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arch: armv8: Remove the error when dcache is
> off
>
>
>
> On 27.06.17 13:52, Michal Simek wrote:
> > On 27.6.2017 13:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 27.06.17 13:20, Michal Simek wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >&g
34 PM
> >> To: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu ; Michal Simek
> >>
> >> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Tom Rini ; Simon Glass
> >>
> >> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arch: armv8: Remove the error when
> >> dcache is off
> >>
> >>
> >>
On 27.06.17 13:52, Michal Simek wrote:
On 27.6.2017 13:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.06.17 13:20, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
On 27.6.2017 13:01, Alexander Graf wrote:
I don't think that's going to work - at least not without compiler flag
changes. By default, gcc will happily generate unal
; Tom Rini ; Simon Glass
; Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arch: armv8: Remove the error when
dcache is off
Am 27.06.2017 um 13:52 schrieb Michal Simek
:
On 27.6.2017 13:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.06.17 13:20, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
On 27.6.2017 13:01
;> To: Michal Simek
> >> Cc: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu ;
> >> u-boot@lists.denx.de; Tom Rini ; Simon Glass
> >> ; Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu
> >> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arch: armv8: Remove the error when
> >> dcache is off
> >>
&g
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arch: armv8: Remove the error when dcache is
off
Am 27.06.2017 um 13:52 schrieb Michal Simek :
On 27.6.2017 13:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.06.17 13:20, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
On 27.6.2017 13:01, Alexander Graf wrote:
I don't think that's goi
oot] [PATCH] arch: armv8: Remove the error when dcache is
> off
>
>
>
> > Am 27.06.2017 um 13:52 schrieb Michal Simek :
> >
> >> On 27.6.2017 13:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 27.06.17 13:20, Michal Simek wrote:
>
> Am 27.06.2017 um 13:52 schrieb Michal Simek :
>
>> On 27.6.2017 13:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 27.06.17 13:20, Michal Simek wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
On 27.6.2017 13:01, Alexander Graf wrote:
I don't think that's going to work - at least not without compiler flag
changes.
On 27.6.2017 13:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 27.06.17 13:20, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 27.6.2017 13:01, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> I don't think that's going to work - at least not without compiler flag
>>> changes. By default, gcc will happily generate unaligned accesses. If
>>> y
On 27.06.17 13:20, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
On 27.6.2017 13:01, Alexander Graf wrote:
I don't think that's going to work - at least not without compiler flag
changes. By default, gcc will happily generate unaligned accesses. If
you disable dcache, these will trap.
What's that compiler flags
Hi,
On 27.6.2017 13:01, Alexander Graf wrote:
> I don't think that's going to work - at least not without compiler flag
> changes. By default, gcc will happily generate unaligned accesses. If
> you disable dcache, these will trap.
What's that compiler flags we should be using to avoid that?
The
I don't think that's going to work - at least not without compiler flag
changes. By default, gcc will happily generate unaligned accesses. If
you disable dcache, these will trap.
Alex
On 27.06.17 11:04, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi guys,
do you have any concern about this change?
Thanks,
Michal
Hi guys,
do you have any concern about this change?
Thanks,
Michal
On 22.6.2017 12:00, Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu wrote:
> Remove the error which causes compilation failure when
> dcache is off for builds otherthan SPL. There may be
> cases where user wants to disable dcache completely
> eventho
14 matches
Mail list logo