Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] always relocate fdt into an lmb-allocated memory block

2010-10-19 Thread Kumar Gala
On May 24, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > The device tree (fdt) must always exist in within the bootmap (usually the > first 16MB of RAM). If it doesn't, then boot_relocate_fdt() will allocate an > LMB region in the bootmap and copy the fdt into that region. It will also > increase the s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] always relocate fdt into an lmb-allocated memory block

2010-10-18 Thread Timur Tabi
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > The device tree (fdt) must always exist in within the bootmap (usually the > first 16MB of RAM).  If it doesn't, then boot_relocate_fdt() will allocate an > LMB region in the bootmap and copy the fdt into that region.  It will also > increase th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] always relocate fdt into an lmb-allocated memory block

2010-10-11 Thread Timur Tabi
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >> I would like to see any ACK or Tested-by: from actual users of this code. > > Kumar, who should ack this patch? This patch has been tested and acked by Ira Synder: http://lists.denx.de

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] always relocate fdt into an lmb-allocated memory block

2010-08-20 Thread Timur Tabi
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > I would like to see any ACK or Tested-by: from actual users of this code. Kumar, who should ack this patch? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] always relocate fdt into an lmb-allocated memory block

2010-08-07 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kumar, In message <20100802205706.56072d3c...@gemini.denx.de> I wrote: > > In message you > wrote: > > > > As this isn't to 8xxx related code I'm NOT going to apply it. Wolfgang > > should. > > Which boards except 8xxx actually use that code? I mean, which boards > can be used for testi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] always relocate fdt into an lmb-allocated memory block

2010-08-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kumar Gala, In message you wrote: > > As this isn't to 8xxx related code I'm NOT going to apply it. Wolfgang > should. Which boards except 8xxx actually use that code? I mean, which boards can be used for testing? [I don't remember any Tested-by: messages ?] Best regards, Wolfgang Denk

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] always relocate fdt into an lmb-allocated memory block

2010-08-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 2, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: > Kumar, do you have any issues with this patch? I submitted it in May, > but you never picked it up. > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: >> The device tree (fdt) must always exist in within the bootmap (usually the >> first 16M

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] always relocate fdt into an lmb-allocated memory block

2010-08-02 Thread Timur Tabi
Kumar, do you have any issues with this patch? I submitted it in May, but you never picked it up. On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > The device tree (fdt) must always exist in within the bootmap (usually the > first 16MB of RAM).  If it doesn't, then boot_relocate_fdt() will al

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] always relocate fdt into an lmb-allocated memory block

2010-07-17 Thread Tabi Timur-B04825
On Jul 17, 2010, at 10:17 PM, "Jerry Van Baren" wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi > ^ > Need a space in your SOB line? That's your mailer, not me. Check the archive -- my message is correct. > I assume this is a "live" patch, and replaces the patch with the subject

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] always relocate fdt into an lmb-allocated memory block

2010-07-17 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Hi Timur, On 05/24/2010 04:10 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > The device tree (fdt) must always exist in within the bootmap (usually the > first 16MB of RAM). If it doesn't, then boot_relocate_fdt() will allocate an > LMB region in the bootmap and copy the fdt into that region. It will also > increase t