Hi Tom,
[...]
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT
>
> CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT is not used in the other patches.
> Why is this needed ?
> board/samsung/samsung/smdk6400 has a lowlevel_init.o function.
> It is confusing why this function is being if-def and not the real
> lowlevel_init..
Will
Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
> The current ARM1176 CPU specific code is too specific to the SMDK6400
> architecture. The following changes were necessary prerequisites for the
> addition of other SoCs based on ARM1176.
>
> Existing board's (SMDK6400) configuration has been modified to keep behavior
>
Tom,
> I was not able to access this link
> But, yes, please include this patch as part of the tnetv107x patchset.
Sure. I will include this with the larger TNETV107X patchset and submit.
Until then, a code preview can be found at
http://arago-project.org/git/people/?p=cyril/u-boot-tnetv107x.gi
Chemparathy, Cyril wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
>> This patch is premature.
>> I need to see this patch within the context of the new SOC.
>>
>> For a new SOC, I would like it be added as a new sub dir off of cpu/arm1176.
>> At the same level as s3c64xx. So this dir would look like.
>>
>> config.mk cpu.c
Hi Tom,
> This patch is premature.
> I need to see this patch within the context of the new SOC.
>
> For a new SOC, I would like it be added as a new sub dir off of cpu/arm1176.
> At the same level as s3c64xx. So this dir would look like.
>
> config.mk cpu.c Makefile new_soc_name s3c64xx st
Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
> The current ARM1176 CPU specific code is too specific to the SMDK6400
> architecture. The following changes were necessary prerequisites for the
> addition of other SoCs based on ARM1176.
>
> Existing board's (SMDK6400) configuration has been modified to keep behavior
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
