Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-05-13 Thread Pali Rohár
On Monday 10 May 2021 10:28:05 Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Marek, > > On Sun, 9 May 2021 at 12:45, Marek Behun wrote: > > > > On Sun, 9 May 2021 09:14:14 -0500 > > Adam Ford wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 10:06 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 21:45:02 -0600 > > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-05-10 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Marek, On Sun, 9 May 2021 at 12:45, Marek Behun wrote: > > On Sun, 9 May 2021 09:14:14 -0500 > Adam Ford wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 10:06 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 21:45:02 -0600 > > > Adam Ford wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 3:49 PM Marek Be

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-05-09 Thread Marek Behun
On Sun, 9 May 2021 09:14:14 -0500 Adam Ford wrote: > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 10:06 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 21:45:02 -0600 > > Adam Ford wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 3:49 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 22:38:52 +0100 > > > > Pali

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-05-09 Thread Adam Ford
On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 10:06 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 21:45:02 -0600 > Adam Ford wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 3:49 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 22:38:52 +0100 > > > Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > > > > On Saturday 06 March 2021 22:19:22 Marek Behun

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-06 Thread Marek Behun
On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 21:45:02 -0600 Adam Ford wrote: > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 3:49 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 22:38:52 +0100 > > Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > > On Saturday 06 March 2021 22:19:22 Marek Behun wrote: > > > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 22:00:45 +0100 > > > > Pali Rohár

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-06 Thread Adam Ford
On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 3:49 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 22:38:52 +0100 > Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Saturday 06 March 2021 22:19:22 Marek Behun wrote: > > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 22:00:45 +0100 > > > Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > > > > On Saturday 06 March 2021 21:54:00 Marek Behun wro

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-06 Thread Marek Behun
On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 22:38:52 +0100 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Saturday 06 March 2021 22:19:22 Marek Behun wrote: > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 22:00:45 +0100 > > Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > > On Saturday 06 March 2021 21:54:00 Marek Behun wrote: > > > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 21:41:14 +0100 > > > > Pali Rohá

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-06 Thread Pali Rohár
On Saturday 06 March 2021 22:19:22 Marek Behun wrote: > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 22:00:45 +0100 > Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Saturday 06 March 2021 21:54:00 Marek Behun wrote: > > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 21:41:14 +0100 > > > Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > > > > On Saturday 06 March 2021 15:08:13 Tom Rini w

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-06 Thread Marek Behun
On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 22:00:45 +0100 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Saturday 06 March 2021 21:54:00 Marek Behun wrote: > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 21:41:14 +0100 > > Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > > On Saturday 06 March 2021 15:08:13 Tom Rini wrote: > > > > Perhaps we'll default to yes on some SoCs. The omap3

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-06 Thread Pali Rohár
On Saturday 06 March 2021 21:54:00 Marek Behun wrote: > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 21:41:14 +0100 > Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Saturday 06 March 2021 15:08:13 Tom Rini wrote: > > > Perhaps we'll default to yes on some SoCs. The omap3 thing is a bit > > > odd, but we'll see what happens on real N900 hard

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-06 Thread Marek Behun
On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 21:41:14 +0100 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Saturday 06 March 2021 15:08:13 Tom Rini wrote: > > Perhaps we'll default to yes on some SoCs. The omap3 thing is a bit > > odd, but we'll see what happens on real N900 hardware. > > Hello! > > Could you send me a link to git repo / br

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-06 Thread Pali Rohár
On Saturday 06 March 2021 15:08:13 Tom Rini wrote: > Perhaps we'll default to yes on some SoCs. The omap3 thing is a bit > odd, but we'll see what happens on real N900 hardware. Hello! Could you send me a link to git repo / branch and tell me from which commit should I do tests on real N900 hard

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-06 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 06:37:49PM +0100, Marek Behun wrote: > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 05:12:12 -0600 > Adam Ford wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 9:03 PM Adam Ford wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 11:10 AM Adam Ford wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 6:31 AM Stefan Roese w

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-06 Thread Marek Behun
On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 05:12:12 -0600 Adam Ford wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 9:03 PM Adam Ford wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 11:10 AM Adam Ford wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 6:31 AM Stefan Roese wrote: > > > > > > > > On 05.03.21 12:25, Adam Ford wrote: > > > > > On Th

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-06 Thread Adam Ford
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 9:03 PM Adam Ford wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 11:10 AM Adam Ford wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 6:31 AM Stefan Roese wrote: > > > > > > On 05.03.21 12:25, Adam Ford wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:33 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, 4 M

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-05 Thread Adam Ford
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 11:10 AM Adam Ford wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 6:31 AM Stefan Roese wrote: > > > > On 05.03.21 12:25, Adam Ford wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:33 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > >> > > >> On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:18:03 -0600 > > >> Adam Ford wrote: > > >> > > >>> diff

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-05 Thread Adam Ford
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 6:31 AM Stefan Roese wrote: > > On 05.03.21 12:25, Adam Ford wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:33 PM Marek Behun wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:18:03 -0600 > >> Adam Ford wrote: > >> > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap3/Makefile > >>> b/arch/arm/mach-omap

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-05 Thread Stefan Roese
On 05.03.21 12:25, Adam Ford wrote: On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:33 PM Marek Behun wrote: On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:18:03 -0600 Adam Ford wrote: diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap3/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap3/Makefile index 91ed8ebc9f..a2cc21c6d2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap3/M

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-05 Thread Adam Ford
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:33 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:18:03 -0600 > Adam Ford wrote: > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap3/Makefile > > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap3/Makefile > > index 91ed8ebc9f..a2cc21c6d2 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap3/Makefile > > +++ b/

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-04 Thread Marek Behun
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:18:03 -0600 Adam Ford wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap3/Makefile > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap3/Makefile > index 91ed8ebc9f..a2cc21c6d2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap3/Makefile > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap3/Makefile > @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ > # If clock.c

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-04 Thread Adam Ford
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:59 AM Marek Behun wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:07:33 -0600 > Adam Ford wrote: > > > Interesting. with LTO enabled, the DRAM reports 7.2 GB and hangs. > > Without LTO, U-Boot boots fine. > > > > LTO: > > OMAP3630/3730-GP ES1.2, CPU-OPP2, L3-200MHz, Max CPU Clock 1 GHz

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-04 Thread Pali Rohár
On Thursday 04 March 2021 11:17:01 Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 09:07:33AM -0600, Adam Ford wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:58 AM Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 07:46:18AM -0600, Adam Ford wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:43 AM Marek Behun wrote: > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-04 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 04:37:29PM +0100, Marek Behun wrote: > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:07:33 -0600 > Adam Ford wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:58 AM Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 07:46:18AM -0600, Adam Ford wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:43 AM Marek Behun wr

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-04 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 09:07:33AM -0600, Adam Ford wrote: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:58 AM Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 07:46:18AM -0600, Adam Ford wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:43 AM Marek Behun wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:36:05 -0500 > > > > Tom Rini

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-04 Thread Marek Behun
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:07:33 -0600 Adam Ford wrote: > Interesting. with LTO enabled, the DRAM reports 7.2 GB and hangs. > Without LTO, U-Boot boots fine. > > LTO: > OMAP3630/3730-GP ES1.2, CPU-OPP2, L3-200MHz, Max CPU Clock 1 GHz > Model: LogicPD Zoom DM3730 Torpedo + Wireless Development Kit >

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-04 Thread Marek Behun
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:07:33 -0600 Adam Ford wrote: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:58 AM Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 07:46:18AM -0600, Adam Ford wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:43 AM Marek Behun wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:36:05 -0500 > > > > Tom Rini

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-04 Thread Adam Ford
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:58 AM Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 07:46:18AM -0600, Adam Ford wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:43 AM Marek Behun wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:36:05 -0500 > > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > So, as I start testing things locally with two add

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-04 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 07:46:18AM -0600, Adam Ford wrote: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:43 AM Marek Behun wrote: > > > > On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:36:05 -0500 > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > So, as I start testing things locally with two additional changes (1. > > > LTO by default 2. No ffunction/data-se

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-04 Thread Adam Ford
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 7:50 AM Marek Behun wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 07:46:18 -0600 > Adam Ford wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:43 AM Marek Behun wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:36:05 -0500 > > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > So, as I start testing things locally with two add

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-04 Thread Marek Behun
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 07:46:18 -0600 Adam Ford wrote: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:43 AM Marek Behun wrote: > > > > On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:36:05 -0500 > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > So, as I start testing things locally with two additional changes (1. > > > LTO by default 2. No ffunction/data-sectio

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-04 Thread Adam Ford
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 4:43 AM Marek Behun wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:36:05 -0500 > Tom Rini wrote: > > > So, as I start testing things locally with two additional changes (1. > > LTO by default 2. No ffunction/data-sections with LTO) we see: > > https://gist.github.com/trini/350ab850c42293

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-04 Thread Marek Behun
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:36:05 -0500 Tom Rini wrote: > So, as I start testing things locally with two additional changes (1. > LTO by default 2. No ffunction/data-sections with LTO) we see: > https://gist.github.com/trini/350ab850c42293563228b8d68a1bb89a > as the detailed size reduction. This also

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-03 Thread Adam Ford
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 3:36 PM Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:41:57PM +0100, Marek Behun wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 11:11:59 -0500 > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:11:59AM +0100, Marek Behún wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I have managed to a

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-03 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:41:57PM +0100, Marek Behun wrote: > On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 11:11:59 -0500 > Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:11:59AM +0100, Marek Behún wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I have managed to add support for building U-Boot with LTO (with GCC) > > > in a rat

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-03 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:41:57PM +0100, Marek Behun wrote: > On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 11:11:59 -0500 > Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:11:59AM +0100, Marek Behún wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I have managed to add support for building U-Boot with LTO (with GCC) > > > in a rat

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-03 Thread Marek Behun
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 11:11:59 -0500 Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:11:59AM +0100, Marek Behún wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I have managed to add support for building U-Boot with LTO (with GCC) > > in a rather sane way (in LOC changed). > > > > This series and its follows will also b

Re: [RFC PATCH u-boot 00/12] U-Boot LTO (Sandbox + ARM Nokia RX-51)

2021-03-03 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:11:59AM +0100, Marek Behún wrote: > Hello, > > I have managed to add support for building U-Boot with LTO (with GCC) > in a rather sane way (in LOC changed). > > This series and its follows will also be available at > https://github.com/elkablo/u-boot branch lto. > >