Re: [PATCH v2 077/169] Correct SPL use of EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL

Hi Heinrich, On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 01:40, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > On 2/7/23 05:02, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Heinrich, > > > > On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 16:41, Heinrich Schuchardt > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 2/5/23 23:39, Simon Glass wrote: > >>> This converts 1 usage of this option to

Re: [PATCH v2 077/169] Correct SPL use of EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL

On 2/7/23 05:02, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Heinrich, On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 16:41, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: On 2/5/23 23:39, Simon Glass wrote: This converts 1 usage of this option to the non-SPL form, since there is no SPL_EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL defined in Kconfig Why do you touch the code? I c

Re: [PATCH v2 077/169] Correct SPL use of EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL

Hi Heinrich, On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 16:41, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > > On 2/5/23 23:39, Simon Glass wrote: > > This converts 1 usage of this option to the non-SPL form, since there is > > no SPL_EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL defined in Kconfig > > Why do you touch the code? I can't see any problem bein

Re: [PATCH v2 077/169] Correct SPL use of EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL

On 2/5/23 23:39, Simon Glass wrote: This converts 1 usage of this option to the non-SPL form, since there is no SPL_EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL defined in Kconfig Why do you touch the code? I can't see any problem being solved. Best regards Heinrich Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- (no changes si