Dear Tom,
In message <20201106205245.GH5340@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> Sorry for the lack of feedback. I guess, I just don't know. There's at
> least two series now (this and Simon's setexp) where part of the
> feedback has been "our hush is ancient, and we should replace and keep
> it in syn
On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 08:25:31AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 07/10/2020 09.20, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > This enables one to use positional arguments $1..$9 in functions
> > defined in the environment,
>
> Tom, can I ask for a decision on these? I know Wolfgang is opposed, and
> if th
On 07/10/2020 09.20, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> This enables one to use positional arguments $1..$9 in functions
> defined in the environment,
Tom, can I ask for a decision on these? I know Wolfgang is opposed, and
if that counts as a veto, fine, I'd just like to know so these are at
least not kep
3 matches
Mail list logo
