On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:25:53PM +0800, Zixian Zeng wrote:
> On 25/04/30 01:32PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 02:26:04PM -0500, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> > > On April 30, 2025 thus sayeth Tom Rini:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:56:27PM +0530, Raghavendra, Vignesh wrote:
> > > >
On 25/04/30 01:32PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 02:26:04PM -0500, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> > On April 30, 2025 thus sayeth Tom Rini:
> > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:56:27PM +0530, Raghavendra, Vignesh wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 4/30/2025 10:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > > On
On 25/04/30 01:32PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 02:26:04PM -0500, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> > On April 30, 2025 thus sayeth Tom Rini:
> > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:56:27PM +0530, Raghavendra, Vignesh wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 4/30/2025 10:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > > On
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 02:31:49PM -0500, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> On April 30, 2025 thus sayeth Bryan Brattlof:
> > On April 30, 2025 thus sayeth Tom Rini:
> > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:56:27PM +0530, Raghavendra, Vignesh wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 4/30/2025 10:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 02:26:04PM -0500, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> On April 30, 2025 thus sayeth Tom Rini:
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:56:27PM +0530, Raghavendra, Vignesh wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/30/2025 10:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 11:29:04AM -0500, Bryan Brat
On April 30, 2025 thus sayeth Bryan Brattlof:
> On April 30, 2025 thus sayeth Tom Rini:
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:56:27PM +0530, Raghavendra, Vignesh wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/30/2025 10:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 11:29:04AM -0500, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> > >
On April 30, 2025 thus sayeth Tom Rini:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:56:27PM +0530, Raghavendra, Vignesh wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 4/30/2025 10:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 11:29:04AM -0500, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> > >> On April 30, 2025 thus sayeth Anshul Dalal:
> > >>> As di
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:56:27PM +0530, Raghavendra, Vignesh wrote:
>
>
> On 4/30/2025 10:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 11:29:04AM -0500, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> >> On April 30, 2025 thus sayeth Anshul Dalal:
> >>> As discussed here[1], the go command causes undefined behav
On 4/30/2025 10:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 11:29:04AM -0500, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
>> On April 30, 2025 thus sayeth Anshul Dalal:
>>> As discussed here[1], the go command causes undefined behavior when used
>>> for running custom OSes since the icache might hold outdated da
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 11:29:04AM -0500, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> On April 30, 2025 thus sayeth Anshul Dalal:
> > As discussed here[1], the go command causes undefined behavior when used
> > for running custom OSes since the icache might hold outdated data. OSes
> > usually also expect the MMU to b
On April 30, 2025 thus sayeth Anshul Dalal:
> As discussed here[1], the go command causes undefined behavior when used
> for running custom OSes since the icache might hold outdated data. OSes
> usually also expect the MMU to be disabled upon execution.
>
> Therefore this patch adds a call to clea
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 09:27:30PM +0530, Anshul Dalal wrote:
> On Wed Apr 30, 2025 at 7:46 PM IST, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 07:27:50PM +0530, Anshul Dalal wrote:
> >
> >> As discussed here[1], the go command causes undefined behavior when used
> >> for running custom OSes since
On Wed Apr 30, 2025 at 7:46 PM IST, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 07:27:50PM +0530, Anshul Dalal wrote:
>
>> As discussed here[1], the go command causes undefined behavior when used
>> for running custom OSes since the icache might hold outdated data. OSes
>> usually also expect the MMU
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 07:27:50PM +0530, Anshul Dalal wrote:
> As discussed here[1], the go command causes undefined behavior when used
> for running custom OSes since the icache might hold outdated data. OSes
> usually also expect the MMU to be disabled upon execution.
>
> Therefore this patch
14 matches
Mail list logo