Re: [PATCH 3/5] pxe_utils: Allow the FDT to be missing

2025-01-15 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Quentin, On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 at 04:59, Quentin Schulz wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > On 1/15/25 2:16 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Quentin, > > > > On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 at 08:13, Quentin Schulz > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Simon, > >> > >> On 12/20/24 5:01 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > >>> The devicetree fil

Re: [PATCH 3/5] pxe_utils: Allow the FDT to be missing

2025-01-15 Thread Quentin Schulz
Hi Simon, On 1/15/25 2:16 AM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Quentin, On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 at 08:13, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Simon, On 12/20/24 5:01 AM, Simon Glass wrote: The devicetree file may not be provided, so avoid a failure in that case. Can you provide a bit more information on when/why

Re: [PATCH 3/5] pxe_utils: Allow the FDT to be missing

2025-01-14 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Quentin, On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 at 08:13, Quentin Schulz wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > On 12/20/24 5:01 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > The devicetree file may not be provided, so avoid a failure in that > > case. > > > > Can you provide a bit more information on when/why this shouldn't be a > failure? I a

Re: [PATCH 3/5] pxe_utils: Allow the FDT to be missing

2025-01-14 Thread Quentin Schulz
Hi Simon, On 12/20/24 5:01 AM, Simon Glass wrote: The devicetree file may not be provided, so avoid a failure in that case. Can you provide a bit more information on when/why this shouldn't be a failure? I assume likely x86? or Aarch64 with ACPI instead of OF? Cheers, Quentin

Re: [PATCH 3/5] pxe_utils: Allow the FDT to be missing

2024-12-20 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 09:01:18PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > The devicetree file may not be provided, so avoid a failure in that > case. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Reviewed-by: Tom Rini -- Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature