Re: [PATCH 1/4] bootm: Allow ignoring the load address with kernel_noload

2023-11-06 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 13:15, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:58:46PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 11:30, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 10:25:00AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > On S

Re: [PATCH 1/4] bootm: Allow ignoring the load address with kernel_noload

2023-11-06 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:58:46PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 11:30, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 10:25:00AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 at 14:19, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 05, 2

Re: [PATCH 1/4] bootm: Allow ignoring the load address with kernel_noload

2023-11-06 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 11:30, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 10:25:00AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 at 14:19, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 01:03:51PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > > This image type is suppos

Re: [PATCH 1/4] bootm: Allow ignoring the load address with kernel_noload

2023-11-06 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 10:25:00AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 at 14:19, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 01:03:51PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > This image type is supposed to ignore the load address. But at present > > > it fails if the load

Re: [PATCH 1/4] bootm: Allow ignoring the load address with kernel_noload

2023-11-06 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 at 14:19, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 01:03:51PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > This image type is supposed to ignore the load address. But at present > > it fails if the load address is missing. If it is zero, the image is > > loaded at address 0, whic

Re: [PATCH 1/4] bootm: Allow ignoring the load address with kernel_noload

2023-11-05 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 01:03:51PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > This image type is supposed to ignore the load address. But at present > it fails if the load address is missing. If it is zero, the image is > loaded at address 0, which may not work on all boards. > > Make use of the kernel_addr_r e