Re: [PATCH 08/40] efi: Correct address handling with ACPI tables

2022-01-23 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Heinrich, On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 11:13, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > On 12/1/21 17:02, Simon Glass wrote: > > The current EFI implementation confuses pointers and addresses. Normally > > we can get away with this but in the case of sandbox it causes failures. > > > > Despite the fact that efi

Re: [PATCH 08/40] efi: Correct address handling with ACPI tables

2021-12-01 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Heinrich, On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 11:13, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > On 12/1/21 17:02, Simon Glass wrote: > > The current EFI implementation confuses pointers and addresses. Normally > > we can get away with this but in the case of sandbox it causes failures. > > > > Despite the fact that efi

Re: [PATCH 08/40] efi: Correct address handling with ACPI tables

2021-12-01 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 12/1/21 17:02, Simon Glass wrote: The current EFI implementation confuses pointers and addresses. Normally we can get away with this but in the case of sandbox it causes failures. Despite the fact that efi_allocate_pages() returns a u64, it is actually a pointer, not an address. Add special h