On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 11:39 AM Mattijs Korpershoek
wrote:
>
> Hi Eugen,
>
> On lun., mars 31, 2025 at 12:26, Eugen Hristev
> wrote:
>
> > On 3/31/25 12:05, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
> >> Hi Eugen, Zixun,
> >>
> >> On lun., mars 24, 2025 at 11:23, Eugen Hristev
> >> wrote:
> > If there is a
Hi Eugen,
On lun., mars 31, 2025 at 12:26, Eugen Hristev wrote:
> On 3/31/25 12:05, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
>> Hi Eugen, Zixun,
>>
>> On lun., mars 24, 2025 at 11:23, Eugen Hristev
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/22/25 22:56, Zixun LI wrote:
Add compatible "microchip,sam9x60-udc" and device tr
On 3/31/25 12:05, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
> Hi Eugen, Zixun,
>
> On lun., mars 24, 2025 at 11:23, Eugen Hristev
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/22/25 22:56, Zixun LI wrote:
>>> Add compatible "microchip,sam9x60-udc" and device tree binding.
>>> Compared to SAM9X5 the only difference is the DPRAM memor
Hi Eugen, Zixun,
On lun., mars 24, 2025 at 11:23, Eugen Hristev wrote:
> On 3/22/25 22:56, Zixun LI wrote:
>> Add compatible "microchip,sam9x60-udc" and device tree binding.
>> Compared to SAM9X5 the only difference is the DPRAM memory from the
>> USB High Speed Device Port (UDPHS) hardware bloc
On 3/22/25 22:56, Zixun LI wrote:
> Add compatible "microchip,sam9x60-udc" and device tree binding.
> Compared to SAM9X5 the only difference is the DPRAM memory from the
> USB High Speed Device Port (UDPHS) hardware block was increased,
> so we can reuse the same endpoint data.
>
> Tested on SA
On 3/22/25 9:56 PM, Zixun LI wrote:
Add compatible "microchip,sam9x60-udc" and device tree binding.
Compared to SAM9X5 the only difference is the DPRAM memory from the
USB High Speed Device Port (UDPHS) hardware block was increased,
so we can reuse the same endpoint data.
Tested on SAM9X60-Curio
6 matches
Mail list logo
