On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 18:36:49 -0600, Tom Rini wrote:
> When reading/writing to memory we cannot assume that a base address of
> 0x0 is correct and functional. So use CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR as the base
> from which we add a bit more padding and being our tests.
>
>
Applied to local tree/v2-tidy-tes
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 19:11, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 06:51:52PM +0100, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 at 01:36, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > When reading/writing to memory we cannot assume that a base address of
> > > 0x0 is correct and fun
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 06:51:52PM +0100, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 at 01:36, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > When reading/writing to memory we cannot assume that a base address of
> > 0x0 is correct and functional. So use CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR as the base
> > from which we add
Hi Tom,
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 at 01:36, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> When reading/writing to memory we cannot assume that a base address of
> 0x0 is correct and functional. So use CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR as the base
> from which we add a bit more padding and being our tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
> ---
4 matches
Mail list logo
