On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:43:43PM +, Andre Przywara wrote:
> At the moment the nvme_get_features() and nvme_set_features() functions
> carry a (somewhat misleading) comment about missing cache maintenance.
>
> As it turns out, nvme_get_features() has no caller at all in the tree,
> and nvme_
On 3/3/21 12:13 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
[...]
@@ -488,12 +489,20 @@ int nvme_get_features(struct nvme_dev *dev, unsigned fid,
unsigned nsid,
c.features.prp1 = cpu_to_le64(dma_addr);
c.features.fid = cpu_to_le32(fid);
+ ret = nvme_submit_admin_cmd(dev, &c, result);
+
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 03:42:40 +0100
Marek Vasut wrote:
Hi,
> On 3/2/21 4:43 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -488,12 +489,20 @@ int nvme_get_features(struct nvme_dev *dev, unsigned
> > fid, unsigned nsid,
> > c.features.prp1 = cpu_to_le64(dma_addr);
> > c.features.fid = cpu_
On 3/2/21 4:43 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
[...]
@@ -488,12 +489,20 @@ int nvme_get_features(struct nvme_dev *dev, unsigned fid,
unsigned nsid,
c.features.prp1 = cpu_to_le64(dma_addr);
c.features.fid = cpu_to_le32(fid);
+ ret = nvme_submit_admin_cmd(dev, &c, result);
+
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 11:43 PM Andre Przywara wrote:
>
> At the moment the nvme_get_features() and nvme_set_features() functions
> carry a (somewhat misleading) comment about missing cache maintenance.
>
> As it turns out, nvme_get_features() has no caller at all in the tree,
> and nvme_set_featu
Hi
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 4:43 PM Andre Przywara wrote:
>
> At the moment the nvme_get_features() and nvme_set_features() functions
> carry a (somewhat misleading) comment about missing cache maintenance.
>
> As it turns out, nvme_get_features() has no caller at all in the tree,
> and nvme_set_fe
6 matches
Mail list logo