On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 03:14:46AM +, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu: imx8_cpu: Avoid revision to corrupt device
> > tree
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 06:58:27PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> >
> > > From: Peng Fan
> > >
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu: imx8_cpu: Avoid revision to corrupt device
> tree
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 06:58:27PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>
> > From: Peng Fan
> >
> > U-Boot device tree is padded just after U-Boot proper. After the
> whole
> > s
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 06:58:27PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan
>
> U-Boot device tree is padded just after U-Boot proper. After the whole
> stuff loaded to DRAM space, the device tree area is conflict with BSS
> region before U-Boot relocation. So any write to BSS area before
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu: imx8_cpu: Avoid revision to corrupt device
> tree
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 01:10:02AM +, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu: imx8_cpu: Avoid revision to corrupt
> device
> > > tree
> > >
> > > On Sa
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 01:10:02AM +, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu: imx8_cpu: Avoid revision to corrupt device
> > tree
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 12:16:14AM +, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu: imx8_cpu:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu: imx8_cpu: Avoid revision to corrupt device
> tree
>
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 12:16:14AM +, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu: imx8_cpu: Avoid revision to corrupt
> device
> > > tree
> > >
> > > > W
On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 12:16:14AM +, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu: imx8_cpu: Avoid revision to corrupt device
> > tree
> >
> > > Why isn't this padding and alignment with the BSS being taken care
> > of
> > > in either the linker
Hi Peng,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 1:56 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> Why isn't this padding and alignment with the BSS being taken care of in
> either the linker script or the binman dts?
I have the same concern as Tom. This fix looks fragile.
Can you propose another solution?
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu: imx8_cpu: Avoid revision to corrupt device
> tree
>
> > Why isn't this padding and alignment with the BSS being taken care
> of
> > in either the linker script or the binman dts?
Sorry, I am not sure what you mean.
Add a alignment in bin
> Why isn't this padding and alignment with the BSS being taken care of in
> either the linker script or the binman dts?
Peng, in addition to Tom's comment: which commit caused the problem?
Please add a Fixes tag.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 06:58:27PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan
>
> U-Boot device tree is padded just after U-Boot proper. After the whole
> stuff loaded to DRAM space, the device tree area is conflict with BSS
> region before U-Boot relocation. So any write to BSS area before
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
