Acked

Acked-by: Angelo Dureghello Thanks ! On 26/09/24 10:44 PM, Simon Glass wrote: This header file is not used, so drop it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- arch/m68k/lib/bootm.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/m68k/lib/bootm.c b/arch/m68k/lib/bootm.c index

Acked

Acked-by: Angelo Dureghello On 24/07/24 5:08 PM, Simon Glass wrote: Only m68k and powerpc use this field, so move it to the arch-specific info, to reduce the size for other archs. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- arch/m68k/cpu/mcf5445x/cpu.c | 2 +- arch/m68k/include/asm

Acked

Hi Tom, Acked-by: Angelo Dureghello thanks, angelo On 19/06/24 11:27 PM, Tom Rini wrote: Implement a weak default version of flush_dcache_all which is based on the ARM default, which is to flush the entire range via flush_dcache_range(...). Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- Cc: Huan Wang Cc

Acked

Only lightly compile-tested. Apart from the two sh4 patches, these are independent of each other and can be applied individually. Thanks for the cleanup, Acked-by: Angelo Dureghello Cc: Angelo Dureghello Cc: Christophe Leroy Cc: Huan Wang Cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu Rasmus Villemoes (7): m68k: r

Re: [U-Boot] Should be Acked-by and Reviewed-by inherited for updated patches?

Hi, 2013/10/28 Masahiro Yamada : > Hello exports. > > > When re-posting updated a patch (or patch series), > should be Acked-by and Reviewed-by tag inherited? > > > Let me give an example. > > > I posted > "First step towards Kbuild: Use Kbuild style ma

[U-Boot] Should be Acked-by and Reviewed-by inherited for updated patches?

Hello exports. When re-posting updated a patch (or patch series), should be Acked-by and Reviewed-by tag inherited? Let me give an example. I posted "First step towards Kbuild: Use Kbuild style makefiles" v3. Simon reviewed it and issued Acked-by tag. > The series: > &