On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 05:08:10PM -, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:01:35PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > All changes do, but you can just reply to this thread.
>
> Ok, here it is again, with the tag.
>
>
> >From 532cc340712c0542526be601c3f9f886e7054e5c Mon Sep 17 00:00
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:01:35PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> All changes do, but you can just reply to this thread.
Ok, here it is again, with the tag.
>From 532cc340712c0542526be601c3f9f886e7054e5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Paul B. Henson"
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 17:44:43 -0700
Subject: [PAT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/07/2013 09:09 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:07:07AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
>> You missed your Signed-off-by in this patch.
>
> Oops; sorry, not that familiar with your development conventions
> and didn't think
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:07:07AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> You missed your Signed-off-by in this patch.
Oops; sorry, not that familiar with your development conventions and
didn't think to review them before sending in such a simple change. I
can resubmit it with that tag if you'd like.
__
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:31:29AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
>
>> Would you mind patching doc/README.ubi ?
>
> Attached. Would you rather I send it to the list as a separate message?
You missed your Signed-off-by in this patch.
Regards,
Fabio
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 05:49:12PM -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:31:29AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > Would you mind patching doc/README.ubi ?
>
> Attached. Would you rather I send it to the list as a separate message?
As a rule, yes. But patchwork picked this one u
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:31:29AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> Would you mind patching doc/README.ubi ?
Attached. Would you rather I send it to the list as a separate message?
>From 532cc340712c0542526be601c3f9f886e7054e5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Paul B. Henson"
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 17:44:
On 5/1/2013 6:31 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
When I specified "ubifsmount ubi0:recovery", it worked perfectly.
Would you mind patching doc/README.ubi ?
Hmm, looks like that currently does not document the ubifsmount command
at all. I'll take a look at it over the weekend and see if I can freshen
i
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 01:54:41PM -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On 4/29/2013 1:57 AM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> >>MX28EVK U-Boot > ubifsmount recovery
> >>
> >>UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_get_sb: cannot open "recovery", error -22
> >>UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_mount: Error reading superblock on volum
On 4/29/2013 1:57 AM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
MX28EVK U-Boot > ubifsmount recovery
UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_get_sb: cannot open "recovery", error -22
UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_mount: Error reading superblock on volume
'recovery' errno=-22!
Try increasing CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN, e.g. to 4MiB. Tha
On 4/29/2013 1:57 AM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_get_sb: cannot open "recovery", error -22
UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_mount: Error reading superblock on volume
'recovery' errno=-22!
Try increasing CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN, e.g. to 4MiB. That fixed it for me
on a different board
"Paul B. Henson" writes:
> I'm trying to get u-boot to read from a ubifs volume on an mx28evk
> board, and failing :(.
[...]
> MX28EVK U-Boot > ubifsmount recovery
>
> UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_get_sb: cannot open "recovery", error -22
> UBIFS error (pid 0): ubifs_mount: Error reading superbloc
I'm trying to get u-boot to read from a ubifs volume on an mx28evk
board, and failing :(.
I've got the nand partitioned:
MX28EVK U-Boot > mtdparts
device nand0 , # parts = 3
#: namesizeoffset mask_flags
0: bootloader 0x0030 0x
13 matches
Mail list logo
