Re: [U-Boot] toolchains toolchains toolchains

2011-11-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 18 November 2011 17:30:01 Daniel Schwierzeck wrote: > For current upstream MIPS support in U-Boot the toolchain should be > built completely with soft-float. thx, i wasn't sure about that. i posted a softfloat one. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message pa

Re: [U-Boot] toolchains toolchains toolchains

2011-11-18 Thread Daniel Schwierzeck
On 11/18/2011 09:20 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: if you're like me, getting toolchains known to work has always been problematic for the arches you don't care about. yes, there's the ELDK, but that doesn't cover all the arches that u-boot supports, and imo, they're "fatter" than necessary. to that

Re: [U-Boot] toolchains toolchains toolchains

2011-11-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 18 November 2011 15:24:11 Bryan Hundven wrote: > Just curious, but have you tried crosstool-ng? i don't need it as Gentoo provides everything for building cross-compilers > Crosstool-ng also has static toolchain support. static linking glibc isn't good -mike signature.asc Description

Re: [U-Boot] toolchains toolchains toolchains

2011-11-18 Thread Bryan Hundven
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > if you're like me, getting toolchains known to work has always been > problematic for the arches you don't care about.  yes, there's the ELDK, but > that doesn't cover all the arches that u-boot supports, and imo, they're > "fatter" than ne

[U-Boot] toolchains toolchains toolchains

2011-11-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
if you're like me, getting toolchains known to work has always been problematic for the arches you don't care about. yes, there's the ELDK, but that doesn't cover all the arches that u-boot supports, and imo, they're "fatter" than necessary. to that end, i've started posting toolchain builds h