Dear John,
In message you wrote:
>
> From: *Wolfgang Denk*
> Date: Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:48 AM
> To: John Rigby
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
>
>
> Dear John Rigby,
> Thanks.
> Does it make sense to restrict this to USB? Or should we decouple the
> protocol part from the actual transport path?
Zach, I did go one more round with WD on the fastboot with a strawman
proposal. I never followed up because I was not sure that the resources
were commited to do it in Linaro.
Forwarded conversation
Subject: [U-Boot] strawman Fastboot in U-Boot Design Doc
From: *John
Hi John,
> Here a first draft design doc. It is based in part on the Fastboot
> implementation in the rowboat git repo (pointer below).
Thanks for this piece of documentation. Itcertainly helped me
understand that the "boot" part in fastboot is kind of a misnomer,
right?
Again it shows that a
Dear John Rigby,
In message you wrote:
> Here a first draft design doc. It is based in part on the Fastboot
> implementation in the rowboat git repo (pointer below).
Thanks.
> Hooks into U-Boot
> =
>
> Fastboot gets access to the USB subsystem via the same interfaces as USB_TT
Here a first draft design doc. It is based in part on the Fastboot
implementation in the rowboat git repo (pointer below).
As always, comments welcome.
John
Purpose
===
Mainline support for Android Fastboot would be useful. Arguing the merits
of Fastboot vs DFU is not in the scope of this
5 matches
Mail list logo
