Re: [U-Boot] spd_dram.c for mpc83xx broken

2009-02-20 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
> > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:25:03 +0100 > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > The spd code for mpc83xx is so broken it isn't funny. This is what I had > > to do to get my > > Micron MT47H64M16-3. This isn't against current u-boot, but it is a start. > > well it applies, but it also nuked the first

Re: [U-Boot] spd_dram.c for mpc83xx broken

2009-02-18 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Kim Phillips wrote on 18/02/2009 02:35:50: > > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:25:03 +0100 > Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > The spd code for mpc83xx is so broken it isn't funny. This is what I had > > to do to get my > > Micron MT47H64M16-3. This isn't against current u-boot, but it is a start. > > w

Re: [U-Boot] spd_dram.c for mpc83xx broken

2009-02-17 Thread Liu Dave-R63238
> well it applies, but it also nuked the first board I tried it on. For > any new ddr work on 83xx, I'd suggest starting with porting the new > common mpc8xxx ddr code. Agree, The original spd_spd.c will go away. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.den

Re: [U-Boot] spd_dram.c for mpc83xx broken

2009-02-17 Thread Kim Phillips
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:25:03 +0100 Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > The spd code for mpc83xx is so broken it isn't funny. This is what I had > to do to get my > Micron MT47H64M16-3. This isn't against current u-boot, but it is a start. well it applies, but it also nuked the first board I tried it on.

[U-Boot] spd_dram.c for mpc83xx broken

2009-02-17 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
The spd code for mpc83xx is so broken it isn't funny. This is what I had to do to get my Micron MT47H64M16-3. This isn't against current u-boot, but it is a start. Jocke PS. Sorry for the attachment, trying to use Lotus Notes as my new E-mail client and I can't find how to insert a f