Re: [U-Boot] powerpc SPL framework: Avoiding relocate_code

2013-09-16 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 15:23 +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote: > On 09/12/2013 11:28 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 16:43 +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >>SPL framework is used to support multi-stage booting. Where first > >> level boot loader is created via SP

Re: [U-Boot] powerpc SPL framework: Avoiding relocate_code

2013-09-13 Thread Prabhakar Kushwaha
On 09/12/2013 11:28 PM, Scott Wood wrote: On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 16:43 +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote: Hi, SPL framework is used to support multi-stage booting. Where first level boot loader is created via SPL having relocate_code() function. I am working on a Freescale's SoC which has less

Re: [U-Boot] powerpc SPL framework: Avoiding relocate_code

2013-09-12 Thread Scott Wood
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 16:43 +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote: > Hi, > > SPL framework is used to support multi-stage booting. Where first > level boot loader is created via SPL having relocate_code() function. > I am working on a Freescale's SoC which has less internal SRAM. > I don't want to u

[U-Boot] powerpc SPL framework: Avoiding relocate_code

2013-09-09 Thread Prabhakar Kushwaha
Hi, SPL framework is used to support multi-stage booting. Where first level boot loader is created via SPL having relocate_code() function. I am working on a Freescale's SoC which has less internal SRAM. I don't want to use relocate_code() as to support this function, I need to reduce SPL bi

[U-Boot] powerpc SPL framework: Avoiding relocate_code

2013-09-09 Thread Prabhakar Kushwaha
Hi, SPL framework is used to support multi-stage booting. Where first level boot loader is created via SPL having relocate_code() function. I am working on a Freescale's SoC which has less internal SRAM. I don't want to use relocate_code() as to support this function, I need to reduce SPL bi