Re: [U-Boot] nand commands missing wtchdog reset

2011-02-01 Thread Scott Wood
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:43:56 +0100 Jaap de Jong wrote: > thanks for your reply. > You are right, the format was totally wrong; I apologize! > Concerning the patch itself: I agree: low-level hangups should trigger > the watchdog although in this specific case the hangups will not occur > due to a

Re: [U-Boot] nand commands missing wtchdog reset

2011-02-01 Thread Jaap de Jong
thanks for your reply. You are right, the format was totally wrong; I apologize! Concerning the patch itself: I agree: low-level hangups should trigger the watchdog although in this specific case the hangups will not occur due to a timeout construction surrounding it. Unfortunately I'm not able t

Re: [U-Boot] nand commands missing wtchdog reset

2011-01-31 Thread Scott Wood
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:16:59 -0600 Scott Wood wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:05:55 +0100 > Jaap de Jong wrote: > > > Hi all, > > On my board (at91sam9263ek) I have enabled the watchdog. > > It will reset the processor after about 16 seconds. > > It looks like it is working but if I'm writing a

Re: [U-Boot] nand commands missing wtchdog reset

2011-01-31 Thread Scott Wood
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:05:55 +0100 Jaap de Jong wrote: > Hi all, > On my board (at91sam9263ek) I have enabled the watchdog. > It will reset the processor after about 16 seconds. > It looks like it is working but if I'm writing a large file into nand it > seems that the watchdog is not reset and

[U-Boot] nand commands missing wtchdog reset

2011-01-31 Thread Jaap de Jong
Hi all, On my board (at91sam9263ek) I have enabled the watchdog. It will reset the processor after about 16 seconds. It looks like it is working but if I'm writing a large file into nand it seems that the watchdog is not reset and finally my processor resets. I've patched it, but I'm not sure if i