On 01/03/2019 14:00, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 13:36:17 +0100
> Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
>>
>> Right, I think this is a way to do.
>
> yes, this is much better than ifdef. I'd suggest using 'phy-reset-post-delay'
> property instead of 'phy-reset-wait'.
Hi all,
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 13:36:17 +0100
Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
...
> > Nope, didn't worked. This parameter is a pulse width of a reset, but the
> > issue is about having a delay *after* reset. However, introducing a new
> > `phy-reset-wait` is a reasonable option.
>
> Right, I
On 01/03/19 13:30, Andrejs Cainikovs wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 01/03/2019 12:19, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>
>> What about to change this in DT ?
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-imx8qxp-mek.dts
>> b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-imx8qxp-mek.dts
>> index 41f7ec1763..b6c4593334 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl
Hi Stefano,
On 01/03/2019 12:19, Stefano Babic wrote:
>
> What about to change this in DT ?
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-imx8qxp-mek.dts
> b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-imx8qxp-mek.dts
> index 41f7ec1763..b6c4593334 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-imx8qxp-mek.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-imx8qxp-mek.d
Hi Stefano,
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 12:19:41 +0100
Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
...
> What about to change this in DT ?
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-imx8qxp-mek.dts
> b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-imx8qxp-mek.dts
> index 41f7ec1763..b6c4593334 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-imx8qxp-mek.dts
> +++ b/a
On 01/03/19 11:05, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 09:50:06 +
> Andrejs Cainikovs andrejs.cainik...@netmodule.com wrote:
> ...
>> Thanks a lot! It works now.
>
> Great, thanks for testing! I don't like the patch however and I'm still
> not sure how we should fix it in a
Hi,
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 09:50:06 +
Andrejs Cainikovs andrejs.cainik...@netmodule.com wrote:
...
> Thanks a lot! It works now.
Great, thanks for testing! I don't like the patch however and I'm still
not sure how we should fix it in a proper way for upcoming release.
Unfortunately, currently I d
Hi,
On 28/02/2019 23:45, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
>
>> I cant get ethernet to work on iMX8QXP MEK board with latest sources
>> (tried v2019.01 as well). Is this a bug or work in progress?
>
> This is probably due to the missing delay after PHY reset in fec_gpio_reset().
>
> Please try with att
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:27:45 +
Andrejs Cainikovs andrejs.cainik...@netmodule.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I cant get ethernet to work on iMX8QXP MEK board with latest sources
> (tried v2019.01 as well). Is this a bug or work in progress?
This is probably due to the missing delay after PHY rese
Hi,
I cant get ethernet to work on iMX8QXP MEK board with latest sources
(tried v2019.01 as well). Is this a bug or work in progress?
---
U-Boot SPL 2019.04-rc2-00134-g783e66816d (Feb 28 2019 - 13:15:40 +0100)
Normal Boot
Trying to boot from MMC2_2
U-Boot 2019.04-rc2-00134-g783e66816d (Feb 28
10 matches
Mail list logo