Hi Wolfgang,
Le 04/03/2012 09:39, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Troy Kisky,
In message<4f52c327.3080...@boundarydevices.com> you wrote:
And which changes 'introduce forward incompatibilities', and what are
these incompatibilities?
See the recent problems that occurred when RMK decided to "c
Hi,
On 03/04/12 13:09, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 03/03/2012 14:30, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Dirk Behme,
>>
>
> Hi,
>
>> In message <4f52015a.2080...@googlemail.com> you wrote:
>>>
Agreed. If these patches were only for backward compatibility I would
not complain much. But they ar
On 03/03/2012 14:30, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Dirk Behme,
>
Hi,
> In message <4f52015a.2080...@googlemail.com> you wrote:
>>
>>> Agreed. If these patches were only for backward compatibility I would
>>> not complain much. But they are known to introduce forward incompati-
>>> bilities with
Dear Troy Kisky,
In message <4f52c327.3080...@boundarydevices.com> you wrote:
>
> >> And which changes 'introduce forward incompatibilities', and what are
> >> these incompatibilities?
> > See the recent problems that occurred when RMK decided to "clean up"
> > the machids file.
> >
> Would you ra
On 3/3/2012 6:30 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Dirk Behme,
In message<4f52015a.2080...@googlemail.com> you wrote:
Agreed. If these patches were only for backward compatibility I would
not complain much. But they are known to introduce forward incompati-
bilities with all this MACH_ID stuff,
Dear Dirk Behme,
In message <4f52015a.2080...@googlemail.com> you wrote:
>
> > Agreed. If these patches were only for backward compatibility I would
> > not complain much. But they are known to introduce forward incompati-
> > bilities with all this MACH_ID stuff, and this is what I would like
Dear Wolfgang,
On 03.03.2012 10:38, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Dirk,
In message<4f51bba9.4090...@googlemail.com> you wrote:
Having Freescale working on these quite old and unclean U-Boot and
Kernel versions is a pain. Kernel is an other topic, but with U-Boot,
thanks to the very good work of
On 03/03/2012 10:38, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Dirk,
>
> In message <4f51bba9.4090...@googlemail.com> you wrote:
>>
>> Having Freescale working on these quite old and unclean U-Boot and
>> Kernel versions is a pain. Kernel is an other topic, but with U-Boot,
>> thanks to the very good work of
On 03/03/2012 00:25, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Eric Nelson,
>
> In message
> <1330728909-12203-1-git-send-email-eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com> you wrote:
>> This series of patches is needed to allow main-line U-Boot to be used
>> with Freescale's Linux 2.6.38 non-DT kernel releases.
>>
>> The
Dear Dirk,
In message <4f51bba9.4090...@googlemail.com> you wrote:
>
> Having Freescale working on these quite old and unclean U-Boot and
> Kernel versions is a pain. Kernel is an other topic, but with U-Boot,
> thanks to the very good work of everybody, we are in a good position
> to get rid
Dear Eric Nelson,
In message <4f515bf1.9030...@boundarydevices.com> you wrote:
>
> I think new code is still being written for 2.6.38, so it may be obsolete,
> but not necessarily old.
It definitely is old - Linux mainline has seen 50240 commits
since v2.6.38, with 3243564 lines added and 2329522
Dear Wolfgang,
On 03.03.2012 00:25, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Eric Nelson,
In message<1330728909-12203-1-git-send-email-eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com>
you wrote:
This series of patches is needed to allow main-line U-Boot to be used
with Freescale's Linux 2.6.38 non-DT kernel releases.
The
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Eric Nelson
wrote:
> These small patches will be a big help to those of us who need to
> support both though, and it's not yet clear how long the kernel
> transition will take.
Agree. It would be extremely helpful if we could run FSL kernel with
mainline U-boot.
On 03/02/2012 04:25 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Eric Nelson,
In message<1330728909-12203-1-git-send-email-eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com>
you wrote:
This series of patches is needed to allow main-line U-Boot to be used
with Freescale's Linux 2.6.38 non-DT kernel releases.
These releases c
Dear Eric Nelson,
In message <1330728909-12203-1-git-send-email-eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com>
you wrote:
> This series of patches is needed to allow main-line U-Boot to be used
> with Freescale's Linux 2.6.38 non-DT kernel releases.
>
> These releases currently require at least the machine ty
> This series of patches is needed to allow main-line U-Boot to be used
> with Freescale's Linux 2.6.38 non-DT kernel releases.
>
> These releases currently require at least the machine type and
> revision atag entries and are configured to load boot scripts from
> the ext3 filesystem.
>
Almost
This series of patches is needed to allow main-line U-Boot to be used
with Freescale's Linux 2.6.38 non-DT kernel releases.
These releases currently require at least the machine type and
revision atag entries and are configured to load boot scripts from
the ext3 filesystem.
__
17 matches
Mail list logo
